In Reply to: RE: This is interesting posted by Ugly on August 22, 2007 at 13:35:02:
"For those, like myself, who never even saw a tube in school the idea of tubes offering superior performance seems a little backwards at first. Otherwise why would the world have switched over to solid state."
You made the assumption that the switch must have been for sonic reasons. I for one have never been convinced that that was indeed the case. More likely considerations: economics (manufacturing cost); convenience (you don't have to replace transistors, theoretically, so you now get sealed up components, i.e., "no user-serviceable parts inside");power-per-dollar ratio, going hand-in-hand with changes in speaker efficiency. I think these issues factored heavily in the switch, and sound quality was not as important, or at least was seen as something that could be overcome (afterall, with lower THD, they must sound better than tubes, right? d'oh!)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Depends on assumptions... - robert young 08/22/0715:19:17 08/22/07 (4)
- RE: Depends on assumptions... - morricab 01:27:01 08/23/07 (1)
- You're right... - robert young 04:17:16 08/23/07 (0)
- RE: Depends on assumptions... - rick_m 17:03:14 08/22/07 (0)
- Absolutely agree. - Ugly 15:48:51 08/22/07 (0)