In Reply to: Is there a reason you ignore the truth? posted by jj on April 25, 2003 at 18:39:51:
"Fact: I answered him."No you did not. You just dug up a study (which may not even be relevant) and parroted it.
When I experience something first hand, and repeatedly so, especially when it provides what I think is profound information about the nature of listening, no study "opposing" it will change what I think I perceive, no matter how "respected" the author of the study might otherwise be. Just like RFI, there are a lot of aspects in listening that have been overlooked in past studies that I say are ghastly important.
We need to continually find and record new phenomena which could possibly explain our perception of sound. And encourage the discussion and investigation of such phenomena. (This is why John Curl has been able to design superior products.) Sticking by established methods and findings, will fail to reveal the reasons why many people have been frustrated with the lack of advancement of the audio art in the past 30 years.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Studies vs. First Hand Observation - Todd Krieger 04/26/0322:49:30 04/26/03 (10)
- Then you reject all knowledge that you didn't develop yourse.f - jj 14:26:09 04/28/03 (8)
- I Hope You Take This as Constructive Criticism... - Todd Krieger 19:51:26 04/28/03 (7)
- Retract that, and get your head out of the sand. - jj 19:22:28 04/29/03 (3)
- Man, What a Predikamunt... - Todd Krieger 22:28:58 04/29/03 (2)
- Oh, go ahead. You're playing to the crowd anyhow.... - jj 22:36:20 04/29/03 (1)
- OK, I'm Playing to the Crowd... - Todd Krieger 23:00:56 04/29/03 (0)
- Re: I Hope You Take This as Constructive Criticism... - cheap-Jack 09:55:11 04/29/03 (2)
- You are a malicious, stalking sock-puppet. - jj 19:08:47 04/29/03 (1)
- Re: You are a malicious, stalking sock-puppet. - cheap-Jack 13:49:16 04/30/03 (0)
- Re: Studies vs. First Hand Observation - john curl 11:55:08 04/27/03 (0)