In Reply to: Let's reverse-engineer the PS Audio Noise Harvester posted by tomsyl1 on June 2, 2008 at 18:16:47:
Why use things that are actually highly developed to do this job instead of considering a boutique product?
What does an engineer choose when designing test equipment that HAS TO BE immune to line crud?
Things like the real deal here;
http://www.cor.com/
Tom Danley
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Let's reverse-engineer the PS Audio Noise Harvester - tomservo 06/3/0812:39:50 06/3/08 (15)
- RE: Let's reverse-engineer the PS Audio Noise Harvester - tomsyl1 14:30:50 06/3/08 (7)
- RE: Let's reverse-engineer the PS Audio Noise Harvester - tomservo 15:23:08 06/3/08 (6)
- How about balanced 120V power for noise reduction? - Atexanathome 18:22:12 06/4/08 (3)
- RE: How about balanced 120V power for noise reduction? - Dan Banquer 12:32:02 06/5/08 (2)
- There's a lot of truth in that... - Atexanathome 15:27:10 06/5/08 (1)
- RE: There's a lot of truth in that... - Dan Banquer 15:43:06 06/5/08 (0)
- RE: Let's reverse-engineer the PS Audio Noise Harvester - tomsyl1 16:05:02 06/3/08 (1)
- RE: Let's reverse-engineer the PS Audio Noise Harvester - chris_w 15:43:35 06/4/08 (0)
- Which of the 30 odd RFI - E-Stat 13:44:37 06/3/08 (3)
- RE: Which of the 30 odd RFI - tomsyl1 14:33:13 06/3/08 (2)
- Maybe yes, maybe no - E-Stat 14:48:45 06/3/08 (1)
- RE: Maybe yes, maybe no - tomsyl1 19:40:00 06/3/08 (0)
- RE: Let's reverse-engineer the PS Audio Noise Harvester - Dan Banquer 13:09:03 06/3/08 (2)
- RE: Let's reverse-engineer the PS Audio Noise Harvester - tomsyl1 14:38:40 06/3/08 (1)
- Right. nt - Dan Banquer 14:41:01 06/3/08 (0)