In Reply to: No one says you can't enjoy your perceptions. posted by Pat D on October 5, 2009 at 18:59:24:
"Why do you need proof of audible differences?"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- looks to me like he asked you... - Analog Scott 10/6/0908:29:21 10/6/09 (19)
- RE: looks to me like he asked you... - Pat D 12:16:07 10/6/09 (18)
- Then we come full circle - Analog Scott 14:44:16 10/6/09 (4)
- You are totally confused. - Pat D 18:37:16 10/6/09 (3)
- You aren't getting it and that makes me confused...... - Analog Scott 23:16:39 10/6/09 (2)
- "Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics." - Pat D 12:57:39 10/8/09 (1)
- No I have no problem with that - Analog Scott 10:48:01 10/10/09 (0)
- The answer is equally easy: it can, if you're willing to substantiate it for yourself. - carcass93 14:02:26 10/6/09 (12)
- Life is too short. - Pat D 18:31:05 10/6/09 (11)
- Where does posting silly demands of others for "proof" on this forum fit into that? - carcass93 08:29:33 10/7/09 (4)
- I only ask if there is proof of extraordinary claims. - Pat D 10:37:34 10/7/09 (2)
- Asked and aswered - there is. Just not for you. N/T - carcass93 12:53:41 10/7/09 (1)
- You haven't indicated any proofs. (nt) - Pat D 16:03:47 10/10/09 (0)
- Well, you have to admit he has a point - kerr 09:09:20 10/7/09 (0)
- More like too busy posting demands for evidence on this forum... - morricab 01:52:15 10/7/09 (5)
- I'm not the one making extraordinary claims about what I can hear. (nt) - Pat D 10:32:29 10/7/09 (4)
- RE: I'm not the one making extraordinary claims about what I can hear. (nt) - morricab 00:54:04 10/8/09 (3)
- "Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics." - Pat D 13:43:47 10/8/09 (1)
- RE: "Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics." - morricab 02:26:35 10/9/09 (0)
- Ah, there's the question! - kerr 04:46:07 10/8/09 (0)