In Reply to: Re: It is trivial to show the opposite posted by theaudiohobby on December 19, 2006 at 14:12:31:
I have had nothing but SETs for the last ten years, but presently have a SS amp. They sound much better these days than when the focus was entirely on their measurements.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "his commentary does not quite fit the real life scenario," no measurements don't. - Norm 12/19/0620:30:05 12/19/06 (14)
- Re:Measurements are always relevant. - theaudiohobby 02:31:13 12/20/06 (13)
- Some put greater stake in measurements. For example the RMAF amp clinics - Norm 06:12:25 12/20/06 (4)
- So, you ask the Boulder rep what the other amp's designer *might* have had for goals? - Pat D 06:56:53 12/20/06 (3)
- No, he thought all that mattered was THD. He was from Stereophile. Nonsense! nt - Norm 08:57:52 12/20/06 (2)
- He was from Stereophile. - John Atkinson 10:35:36 12/21/06 (1)
- Norm has a hard time telling a good story . . . - Pat D 09:27:37 12/27/06 (0)
- Measurements are NOT always relevant. - thetubeguy1954 06:07:34 12/20/06 (7)
- Re: Read the context of those statements - theaudiohobby 07:20:24 12/20/06 (6)
- I did, did you? - thetubeguy1954 08:05:11 12/20/06 (5)
- Re: I did, did you? - theaudiohobby 08:12:19 12/20/06 (4)
- Playing Pat D-Cake Games Now? - thetubeguy1954 10:27:37 12/20/06 (3)
- Re: As per Pat D's comments, logic is not your forte - theaudiohobby 13:46:18 12/20/06 (2)
- You have my sympathy! - Pat D 14:41:27 12/20/06 (1)
- Re: You have my sympathy! Thanks - theaudiohobby 15:25:05 12/20/06 (0)