In Reply to: Re: transient test - Part II posted by Scott Frankland on July 31, 2003 at 22:24:25:
Thanks Scott,One theory about why my "no feedback" amp sounds good is because
all the hi-order harmonics are not just way down (> 90dB), but
way, way down (> 120dB). I only have an uncal'd HP-334 and take
this with a grain of salt...but with 8.38vrms on the secondary
of the transformer at 100Hz, I measure .1% THD. I can't really
claim anything about how far down the hi order harmonics are with
a measurement like this.As Charles suggests below, this amp is impractical to manufacture.
That is a consideration why some people would look to alternative
technologies (I'm not a manufacturer).By getting things really linear using lots of feedback in solid
state (or any other technology), it seems like similiar results
can be achieved (good sound).One thing I notice about the multiplication hump is that with
low feedback, the hi order harmonics are way way down. As more
feedback is applied, these hi order harmonics shoot up. They
start coming down again, as more feedback is applied - but
lazily...that is...it takes a lot of feedback to get them back
to the same levels as the low feedback case.So it looks like for instance, in the case of the Sziklai or the
Hawksford that the large amounts of feedback are present. I think
that the approach you are looking at seems like a very good
direction to head.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: transient test - Part II - mfc 08/1/0313:00:49 08/1/03 (10)
- Re: transient test - Part II - Scott Frankland 14:03:22 08/1/03 (9)
- Re: transient test - Part II - mfc 19:51:38 08/1/03 (8)
- Re: transient test - Part II - Scott Frankland 01:40:08 08/2/03 (7)
- Re: transient test - Part II - mfc 14:20:19 08/2/03 (6)
- Re: transient test - Part II - Scott Frankland 17:19:26 08/2/03 (5)
- Re: transient test - Part II - mfc 18:33:54 08/2/03 (4)
- Re: transient test - Part II - Scott Frankland 19:36:14 08/2/03 (3)
- Re: transient test - Part II - mfc 20:00:19 08/2/03 (2)
- Re: transient test - Part II - Scott Frankland 20:31:20 08/2/03 (1)
- Caution - detour ahead - mfc 21:44:19 08/2/03 (0)