In Reply to: Re: What exactly is... posted by mfc on July 31, 2003 at 12:47:55:
Do you have a reference to Hawksford's original article?Basically it's just an emitter follower driving an emitter follower. The only twist is that the supply voltage on the rail of the first emitter follower is modulated by the audio signal. This only affects the operation of the circuit via the Early effect, whereby the collector current is very slightly dependent upon the collector-emitter voltage.
In a conventional emitter follower the Early effect comes into play, since the collector voltage is constant while the emitter voltage has the audio signal impressed upon it. In this circuit, the second emitter follower is essentially keeping the C-E voltage constant across the first emitter follower via a bootstrap operation.
The only other thing to note is that the two transistors are complementary. This should tend to slightly reduce the even-order distortion compared to a pair of same-sex devices.
Not a bad circuit, but certainly not a fundamentally different circuit than a normal pair of emitter followers (and also not an "inside-out Sziklai")
Thanks,
Charles Hansen
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Well, that's a subtle variation on a emitter follower double... - Charles Hansen 07/31/0315:34:24 07/31/03 (41)
- partial bootstrap - mfc 21:03:14 07/31/03 (32)
- Further thoughts.... - Charles Hansen 21:29:26 07/31/03 (0)
- Thoughts... - Charles Hansen 21:24:00 07/31/03 (30)
- Re: Thoughts... - Scott Frankland 22:33:54 07/31/03 (27)
- I'm a black and white kind of guy... - Charles Hansen 23:20:11 07/31/03 (26)
- Re: I'm a black and white kind of guy... - Scott Frankland 11:35:24 08/1/03 (14)
- Thanks for the info.... - Charles Hansen 21:24:59 08/1/03 (13)
- Re: Thanks for the info.... - Scott Frankland 02:18:02 08/2/03 (12)
- Re: Thanks for the info.... - mfc 12:30:15 08/2/03 (1)
- Re: Thanks for the info.... - Scott Frankland 13:15:05 08/2/03 (0)
- Concerning feedback in the human body... - Charles Hansen 07:05:56 08/2/03 (9)
- Re: Concerning feedback in the human body... - Scott Frankland 11:28:59 08/2/03 (8)
- Well, yahbut... - Charles Hansen 11:57:30 08/2/03 (7)
- Re: Well, yahbut... - Scott Frankland 13:51:24 08/2/03 (6)
- Interesting stuff! - Charles Hansen 21:43:18 08/2/03 (5)
- Feedback here, there, and elsewhere - Scott Frankland 01:41:22 08/3/03 (4)
- Linear Stages - Charles Hansen 08:02:29 08/3/03 (3)
- Re: Linear Stages - Scott Frankland 14:54:08 08/3/03 (1)
- You're right.... - Charles Hansen 20:27:04 08/3/03 (0)
- Re: Linear Stages - Steve Eddy 09:58:08 08/3/03 (0)
- Re: I'm a black and white kind of guy... - mfc 00:07:49 08/1/03 (10)
- Going to the moon... - Charles Hansen 08:50:02 08/1/03 (9)
- Re: Going to the moon... - mfc 11:17:50 08/1/03 (8)
- That is fascinating! - Charles Hansen 22:12:45 08/1/03 (4)
- Re: That is fascinating! - Scott Frankland 11:37:49 08/2/03 (2)
- Well, yahbut... - Charles Hansen 11:59:28 08/2/03 (1)
- Re: Well, yahbut... - Scott Frankland 13:58:48 08/2/03 (0)
- Re: That is fascinating! - mfc 22:32:00 08/1/03 (0)
- Re: Going to the moon... - john curl 13:09:58 08/1/03 (2)
- Resistors - mfc 19:31:29 08/1/03 (1)
- Re: Resistors - john curl 21:03:34 08/1/03 (0)
- Re: Thoughts... - mfc 22:11:30 07/31/03 (1)
- Well, if you think about it... - Charles Hansen 23:31:25 07/31/03 (0)
- Re: Well, that's a subtle variation on a emitter follower double... - Steve Eddy 15:49:44 07/31/03 (7)
- You're right (again), Steve -- you win! (nt) - Charles Hansen 16:28:50 07/31/03 (6)
- Re: You're right (again), Steve -- you win! (nt) - john curl 18:47:05 07/31/03 (4)
- Wasn't that actually the... - Charles Hansen 19:38:34 07/31/03 (3)
- Re: Wasn't that actually the... - jneutron 04:44:30 08/1/03 (2)
- Re: Wasn't that actually the... - Steve Eddy 09:38:26 08/1/03 (1)
- That's the baby.. - jneutron 10:19:40 08/1/03 (0)
- Cool! I'll take that big panda bear. nt - Steve Eddy 16:35:04 07/31/03 (0)