In Reply to: Re: transient test - Part II posted by mfc on July 31, 2003 at 10:34:54:
the "Hawksford circuit"?Thanks,
Charles Hansen
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- What exactly is... - Charles Hansen 07/31/0312:25:14 07/31/03 (47)
- I prefer “Baxendall Super Pairâ€, Hawksford is just the more accessible reference - jcox 06:38:29 08/2/03 (2)
- Thanks for the references... - Charles Hansen 07:16:04 08/2/03 (1)
- more than you wanted to know... - jcox 16:41:10 08/2/03 (0)
- Re: What exactly is... - mfc 12:47:55 07/31/03 (43)
- Well, that's a subtle variation on a emitter follower double... - Charles Hansen 15:34:24 07/31/03 (41)
- partial bootstrap - mfc 21:03:14 07/31/03 (32)
- Further thoughts.... - Charles Hansen 21:29:26 07/31/03 (0)
- Thoughts... - Charles Hansen 21:24:00 07/31/03 (30)
- Re: Thoughts... - Scott Frankland 22:33:54 07/31/03 (27)
- I'm a black and white kind of guy... - Charles Hansen 23:20:11 07/31/03 (26)
- Re: I'm a black and white kind of guy... - Scott Frankland 11:35:24 08/1/03 (14)
- Thanks for the info.... - Charles Hansen 21:24:59 08/1/03 (13)
- Re: Thanks for the info.... - Scott Frankland 02:18:02 08/2/03 (12)
- Re: Thanks for the info.... - mfc 12:30:15 08/2/03 (1)
- Re: Thanks for the info.... - Scott Frankland 13:15:05 08/2/03 (0)
- Concerning feedback in the human body... - Charles Hansen 07:05:56 08/2/03 (9)
- Re: Concerning feedback in the human body... - Scott Frankland 11:28:59 08/2/03 (8)
- Well, yahbut... - Charles Hansen 11:57:30 08/2/03 (7)
- Re: Well, yahbut... - Scott Frankland 13:51:24 08/2/03 (6)
- Interesting stuff! - Charles Hansen 21:43:18 08/2/03 (5)
- Feedback here, there, and elsewhere - Scott Frankland 01:41:22 08/3/03 (4)
- Linear Stages - Charles Hansen 08:02:29 08/3/03 (3)
- Re: Linear Stages - Scott Frankland 14:54:08 08/3/03 (1)
- You're right.... - Charles Hansen 20:27:04 08/3/03 (0)
- Re: Linear Stages - Steve Eddy 09:58:08 08/3/03 (0)
- Re: I'm a black and white kind of guy... - mfc 00:07:49 08/1/03 (10)
- Going to the moon... - Charles Hansen 08:50:02 08/1/03 (9)
- Re: Going to the moon... - mfc 11:17:50 08/1/03 (8)
- That is fascinating! - Charles Hansen 22:12:45 08/1/03 (4)
- Re: That is fascinating! - Scott Frankland 11:37:49 08/2/03 (2)
- Well, yahbut... - Charles Hansen 11:59:28 08/2/03 (1)
- Re: Well, yahbut... - Scott Frankland 13:58:48 08/2/03 (0)
- Re: That is fascinating! - mfc 22:32:00 08/1/03 (0)
- Re: Going to the moon... - john curl 13:09:58 08/1/03 (2)
- Resistors - mfc 19:31:29 08/1/03 (1)
- Re: Resistors - john curl 21:03:34 08/1/03 (0)
- Re: Thoughts... - mfc 22:11:30 07/31/03 (1)
- Well, if you think about it... - Charles Hansen 23:31:25 07/31/03 (0)
- Re: Well, that's a subtle variation on a emitter follower double... - Steve Eddy 15:49:44 07/31/03 (7)
- You're right (again), Steve -- you win! (nt) - Charles Hansen 16:28:50 07/31/03 (6)
- Re: You're right (again), Steve -- you win! (nt) - john curl 18:47:05 07/31/03 (4)
- Wasn't that actually the... - Charles Hansen 19:38:34 07/31/03 (3)
- Re: Wasn't that actually the... - jneutron 04:44:30 08/1/03 (2)
- Re: Wasn't that actually the... - Steve Eddy 09:38:26 08/1/03 (1)
- That's the baby.. - jneutron 10:19:40 08/1/03 (0)
- Cool! I'll take that big panda bear. nt - Steve Eddy 16:35:04 07/31/03 (0)
- Re: What exactly is... - Steve Eddy 13:54:45 07/31/03 (0)