In Reply to: Re: transient test - Part II posted by john curl on July 30, 2003 at 22:58:33:
Hi JC,> leads to adding compensation, and thereby slowing the gain bandwidth
> of the total circuit below that of a simple follower.This actually makes sense to me. Considered as part of a global
feedback loop, in that context, closing the loop, gets you the
linearity.I ran some frequency sweeps for various followers
Circuit MidBand Gain -3dB Frequency Simple .796764 .563312 2.1574Mhz Sziklai uncomp potentially unstable potentially unstable potentially unstable Sziklai comp (3900pF) .991296 .700846 569.105Khz Darlington .966362 .683218 1.2323Mhz Hawksford uncomp .951225 .672516 3.8531Mhz
Hawksform comp (190pF) .951225 .672516 3.0639Mhz It looks like the Hawksford would be very interesting to
investigate as it has a wider bandwidth then a simple follower
and may be more linear as well. Even its uncompensated form shows
only a slight hump rising from .951225v to 1.0077v at 1.875Mhz.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: transient test - Part II - mfc 07/31/0310:34:54 07/31/03 (56)
- Re: transient test - Part II - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 14:46:20 07/31/03 (7)
- Since you asked... - Charles Hansen 16:27:15 07/31/03 (6)
- Re: Since you asked... - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 19:03:33 07/31/03 (5)
- Re: Since you asked... - Charles Hansen 19:54:51 07/31/03 (4)
- Re: Since you asked... - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 20:42:38 08/1/03 (0)
- When does the movie come out? - mfc 21:37:11 07/31/03 (2)
- Re: When does the movie come out? - Scott Frankland 22:07:45 07/31/03 (1)
- It's not that bad... - Charles Hansen 23:36:29 07/31/03 (0)
- What exactly is... - Charles Hansen 12:25:14 07/31/03 (47)
- I prefer “Baxendall Super Pairâ€, Hawksford is just the more accessible reference - jcox 06:38:29 08/2/03 (2)
- Thanks for the references... - Charles Hansen 07:16:04 08/2/03 (1)
- more than you wanted to know... - jcox 16:41:10 08/2/03 (0)
- Re: What exactly is... - mfc 12:47:55 07/31/03 (43)
- Well, that's a subtle variation on a emitter follower double... - Charles Hansen 15:34:24 07/31/03 (41)
- partial bootstrap - mfc 21:03:14 07/31/03 (32)
- Further thoughts.... - Charles Hansen 21:29:26 07/31/03 (0)
- Thoughts... - Charles Hansen 21:24:00 07/31/03 (30)
- Re: Thoughts... - Scott Frankland 22:33:54 07/31/03 (27)
- I'm a black and white kind of guy... - Charles Hansen 23:20:11 07/31/03 (26)
- Re: I'm a black and white kind of guy... - Scott Frankland 11:35:24 08/1/03 (14)
- Thanks for the info.... - Charles Hansen 21:24:59 08/1/03 (13)
- Re: Thanks for the info.... - Scott Frankland 02:18:02 08/2/03 (12)
- Re: Thanks for the info.... - mfc 12:30:15 08/2/03 (1)
- Re: Thanks for the info.... - Scott Frankland 13:15:05 08/2/03 (0)
- Concerning feedback in the human body... - Charles Hansen 07:05:56 08/2/03 (9)
- Re: Concerning feedback in the human body... - Scott Frankland 11:28:59 08/2/03 (8)
- Well, yahbut... - Charles Hansen 11:57:30 08/2/03 (7)
- Re: Well, yahbut... - Scott Frankland 13:51:24 08/2/03 (6)
- Interesting stuff! - Charles Hansen 21:43:18 08/2/03 (5)
- Feedback here, there, and elsewhere - Scott Frankland 01:41:22 08/3/03 (4)
- Linear Stages - Charles Hansen 08:02:29 08/3/03 (3)
- Re: Linear Stages - Scott Frankland 14:54:08 08/3/03 (1)
- You're right.... - Charles Hansen 20:27:04 08/3/03 (0)
- Re: Linear Stages - Steve Eddy 09:58:08 08/3/03 (0)
- Re: I'm a black and white kind of guy... - mfc 00:07:49 08/1/03 (10)
- Going to the moon... - Charles Hansen 08:50:02 08/1/03 (9)
- Re: Going to the moon... - mfc 11:17:50 08/1/03 (8)
- That is fascinating! - Charles Hansen 22:12:45 08/1/03 (4)
- Re: That is fascinating! - Scott Frankland 11:37:49 08/2/03 (2)
- Well, yahbut... - Charles Hansen 11:59:28 08/2/03 (1)
- Re: Well, yahbut... - Scott Frankland 13:58:48 08/2/03 (0)
- Re: That is fascinating! - mfc 22:32:00 08/1/03 (0)
- Re: Going to the moon... - john curl 13:09:58 08/1/03 (2)
- Resistors - mfc 19:31:29 08/1/03 (1)
- Re: Resistors - john curl 21:03:34 08/1/03 (0)
- Re: Thoughts... - mfc 22:11:30 07/31/03 (1)
- Well, if you think about it... - Charles Hansen 23:31:25 07/31/03 (0)
- Re: Well, that's a subtle variation on a emitter follower double... - Steve Eddy 15:49:44 07/31/03 (7)
- You're right (again), Steve -- you win! (nt) - Charles Hansen 16:28:50 07/31/03 (6)
- Re: You're right (again), Steve -- you win! (nt) - john curl 18:47:05 07/31/03 (4)
- Wasn't that actually the... - Charles Hansen 19:38:34 07/31/03 (3)
- Re: Wasn't that actually the... - jneutron 04:44:30 08/1/03 (2)
- Re: Wasn't that actually the... - Steve Eddy 09:38:26 08/1/03 (1)
- That's the baby.. - jneutron 10:19:40 08/1/03 (0)
- Cool! I'll take that big panda bear. nt - Steve Eddy 16:35:04 07/31/03 (0)
- Re: What exactly is... - Steve Eddy 13:54:45 07/31/03 (0)