In Reply to: Re: Cap loaded posted by Scott Frankland on July 24, 2003 at 11:43:40:
Hi,With a .2uF || 10 ohm load the frequency response is down .022dB
at 20Khz. The .25dB point is at 45.4Khz. It rolls off pretty
gracefully from there. The -3dB point (relative to 1Khz)
is 112.14Khz.Increasing the Cap load from .2uF to .6uF and the 20Khz point
is boosted by .72dB. Still no ringing, but a peak forms in
the frequency response at around 43Khz.How do you arbitrarily say what the maximum Cap load a circuit
like this can support?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - test for transients - mfc 22:19:25 07/14/03 (131)
- IM is the elephant... - mfc 00:46:24 07/24/03 (2)
- Re: IM is the elephant... - mfc 15:21:35 07/26/03 (1)
- Re: IM is the elephant... - mfc 18:05:20 07/29/03 (0)
- Some preliminary results - mfc 10:19:55 07/19/03 (25)
- Single EF Results - mfc 18:13:40 07/22/03 (0)
- Compensating Sziklai doesn't help (that much) - mfc 16:07:24 07/22/03 (16)
- Re: Compensating Sziklai doesn't help (that much) - Scott Frankland 18:13:57 07/22/03 (15)
- Re: Compensating Sziklai doesn't help (that much) - mfc 00:15:01 07/23/03 (14)
- Re: Compensating Sziklai doesn't help (that much) - Scott Frankland 00:51:43 07/23/03 (13)
- Cap loaded - mfc 12:28:03 07/23/03 (12)
- Re: Cap loaded - Scott Frankland 12:55:44 07/23/03 (11)
- Re: Cap loaded - Scott Frankland 13:47:34 07/23/03 (10)
- Re: Cap loaded - mfc 14:18:30 07/23/03 (9)
- Re: Cap loaded - mfc 15:19:39 07/23/03 (8)
- Re: Cap loaded - Scott Frankland 17:41:41 07/23/03 (7)
- Re: Cap loaded - mfc 00:36:32 07/24/03 (6)
- Re: Cap loaded - Scott Frankland 11:43:40 07/24/03 (5)
- Re: Cap loaded - mfc 07/25/0317:20:42 07/25/03 (4)
- Re: Cap loaded - Scott Frankland 22:22:30 07/25/03 (3)
- Re: Cap loaded - mfc 12:13:58 07/26/03 (2)
- Re: Cap loaded - Scott Frankland 13:02:21 07/26/03 (1)
- Re: Cap loaded - mfc 14:58:45 07/26/03 (0)
- Some Sziklai follower results - mfc 20:06:55 07/21/03 (4)
- More interesting Sziklai follower results - mfc 14:30:42 07/22/03 (0)
- Re: Some Sziklai follower results - Scott Frankland 23:11:02 07/21/03 (2)
- Re: Some Sziklai follower results - mfc 10:12:37 07/22/03 (1)
- Re: Some Sziklai follower results - Scott Frankland 10:36:08 07/22/03 (0)
- Re: Some preliminary results - Scott Frankland 18:31:02 07/19/03 (1)
- Re: Some preliminary results - mfc 09:37:43 07/21/03 (0)
- No results yet - mfc 01:19:19 07/19/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 10:35:22 07/18/03 (14)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 11:21:43 07/18/03 (13)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 15:42:14 07/18/03 (12)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 20:10:44 07/18/03 (11)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 22:34:11 07/18/03 (2)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 14:35:37 07/19/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 22:53:22 07/18/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 21:14:44 07/18/03 (7)
- Re: test for transients - Scott Frankland 21:56:29 07/18/03 (1)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 22:17:05 07/18/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 21:29:55 07/18/03 (4)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 22:14:39 07/18/03 (3)
- Re: test for transients - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 21:05:22 07/19/03 (2)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 17:01:29 07/22/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 15:09:36 07/21/03 (0)
- I can't see the distortion for all the harmonics ..... - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 17:35:54 07/16/03 (46)
- Re: I can't see the distortion for all the harmonics ..... - mfc 19:16:26 07/16/03 (45)
- Re: I can't see the distortion for all the harmonics ..... - john curl 10:01:41 07/17/03 (0)
- I've caught up a bit .... - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 22:09:05 07/16/03 (0)
- Re: I can't see the distortion for all the harmonics ..... - Steve Eddy 20:00:25 07/16/03 (42)
- Re: "the first step" question - jensw 00:29:36 07/17/03 (1)
- I could be wrong - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 09:36:50 07/17/03 (0)
- Re: I can't see the distortion for all the harmonics ..... - mfc 21:43:43 07/16/03 (1)
- Re: I can't see the distortion for all the harmonics ..... - Steve Eddy 22:19:38 07/16/03 (0)
- It's better to travel in hope .... - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 21:03:06 07/16/03 (33)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - Steve Eddy 21:56:58 07/16/03 (32)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - mfc 00:37:30 07/17/03 (31)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - john curl 09:21:07 07/17/03 (1)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - Steve Eddy 09:38:40 07/17/03 (0)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - john curl 09:16:17 07/17/03 (0)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - Steve Eddy 00:55:15 07/17/03 (27)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - mfc 01:12:45 07/17/03 (26)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - Steve Eddy 09:23:07 07/17/03 (23)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - mfc 13:29:31 07/17/03 (22)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - Steve Eddy 14:05:21 07/17/03 (21)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - mfc 14:09:48 07/18/03 (18)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - Steve Eddy 15:23:07 07/18/03 (17)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - mfc 18:24:06 07/18/03 (16)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - Steve Eddy 21:03:14 07/18/03 (15)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - mfc 21:22:04 07/18/03 (14)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - Steve Eddy 22:05:26 07/18/03 (13)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - mfc 22:44:12 07/18/03 (12)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - Steve Eddy 23:54:53 07/18/03 (11)
- MFC, you're still wasting your time... - Charles Hansen 07:00:13 07/19/03 (7)
- Disagree: this thread is interesting. - Leisure7 16:32:27 07/19/03 (1)
- Re: Disagree: this thread is interesting. - Steve Eddy 18:05:07 07/19/03 (0)
- Re: MFC, you're still wasting your time... - Steve Eddy 15:59:38 07/19/03 (4)
- Gee, Steve, - Charles Hansen 18:20:57 07/19/03 (3)
- Re: Gee, Steve, - Steve Eddy 18:37:02 07/19/03 (2)
- Oh, no -- I've been defeated by.... - Charles Hansen 19:23:54 07/19/03 (1)
- Re: Oh, no -- I've been defeated by.... - Steve Eddy 19:35:43 07/19/03 (0)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - mfc 01:07:58 07/19/03 (2)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - Steve Eddy 16:18:12 07/19/03 (1)
- Re: It's better to travel in hope .... - mfc 09:46:27 07/22/03 (0)
- MFC, you're wasting your time... - Charles Hansen 13:49:53 07/18/03 (1)
- Re: MFC, you're wasting your time... - Steve Eddy 15:33:50 07/18/03 (0)
- Don't sweat it, MFC.... - Charles Hansen 06:59:46 07/17/03 (1)
- Re: Don't sweat it, MFC.... - Steve Eddy 09:17:50 07/17/03 (0)
- Is that the New Symbol SE? - NEAR SOTA 20:53:02 07/16/03 (1)
- Re: Is that the New Symbol SE? - Steve Eddy 21:41:30 07/16/03 (0)
- You're not stepping into... - Charles Hansen 20:41:27 07/16/03 (1)
- Re: You're not stepping into... - Steve Eddy 22:25:35 07/16/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - Jon Risch 19:10:49 07/15/03 (7)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 01:06:35 07/16/03 (3)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 10:41:56 07/16/03 (2)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 14:29:17 07/16/03 (1)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 15:17:41 07/16/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 21:10:06 07/15/03 (2)
- Re: test for transients - Steve Eddy 21:45:12 07/15/03 (1)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 00:31:49 07/16/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 11:40:24 07/15/03 (14)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 13:05:48 07/15/03 (2)
- Re: test for transients - Steve Eddy 13:13:08 07/15/03 (1)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 13:27:49 07/15/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - Steve Eddy 12:12:14 07/15/03 (1)
- Re: test for transients - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 15:54:04 07/15/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 12:06:26 07/15/03 (8)
- Re: test for transients - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 15:38:24 07/15/03 (7)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 20:37:23 07/15/03 (6)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 09:36:50 07/16/03 (5)
- Re: test for transients - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 11:28:01 07/16/03 (4)
- Re: test for transients - Scott Frankland 21:14:19 07/16/03 (2)
- volterra series - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 19:50:53 07/22/03 (1)
- Re: volterra series - Scott Frankland 20:25:44 07/22/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 12:07:13 07/16/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 10:03:44 07/15/03 (13)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 12:31:44 07/15/03 (3)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 12:52:48 07/15/03 (2)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 16:42:30 07/15/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - Steve Eddy 13:08:35 07/15/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - Dan Banquer 11:05:55 07/15/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - Steve Eddy 10:53:03 07/15/03 (7)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 12:10:28 07/15/03 (6)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 12:12:18 07/15/03 (5)
- Re: test for transients - Steve Eddy 12:15:50 07/15/03 (4)
- Re: test for transients - Dan Banquer 12:21:10 07/15/03 (3)
- Re: test for transients - Steve Eddy 12:28:41 07/15/03 (2)
- Re: test for transients - Dan Banquer 12:33:33 07/15/03 (1)
- Re: test for transients - Steve Eddy 12:51:14 07/15/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - Dan Banquer 05:22:11 07/15/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - Scott Frankland 22:23:25 07/14/03 (0)
Follow Ups
- Re: Cap loaded - mfc 07/25/0317:20:42 07/25/03 (4)
- Re: Cap loaded - Scott Frankland 22:22:30 07/25/03 (3)
- Re: Cap loaded - mfc 12:13:58 07/26/03 (2)
- Re: Cap loaded - Scott Frankland 13:02:21 07/26/03 (1)
- Re: Cap loaded - mfc 14:58:45 07/26/03 (0)