In Reply to: Re: test for transients posted by mfc on July 18, 2003 at 11:21:43:
As I remember, (it's been more than 25 years) the triangle peak should be the same height at the square wave. When we do this without computers, we make a square wave, then integrate it to make a triangle wave, etc. As I recall the triangle wave fit just inside the square wave envelope. Now don't worry so much, after all the fundamental should be at the same level, in either case. In truth, you can find out just as much with a single sine wave in this situation. This is because the harmonic and IM distortions are mathematically interrelated here. You will see soon enough. Also, a truncated square wave, with only a few harmonics is a joke when trying to find TIM. It just won't do it.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: test for transients - john curl 07/18/0315:42:14 07/18/03 (12)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 20:10:44 07/18/03 (11)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 22:34:11 07/18/03 (2)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 14:35:37 07/19/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 22:53:22 07/18/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 21:14:44 07/18/03 (7)
- Re: test for transients - Scott Frankland 21:56:29 07/18/03 (1)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 22:17:05 07/18/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 21:29:55 07/18/03 (4)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 22:14:39 07/18/03 (3)
- Re: test for transients - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 21:05:22 07/19/03 (2)
- Re: test for transients - mfc 17:01:29 07/22/03 (0)
- Re: test for transients - john curl 15:09:36 07/21/03 (0)