In Reply to: RE: When was this ideal abandoned? posted by thetubeguy1954 on November 15, 2007 at 11:45:27:
...what's your reaction if I should say, "There is no right and wrong when judging musical instruments"? To which I might add, "Every musician has a certain sonic signature they're looking for, a certain playability; is that so wrong?"
Mustn't we allow that a musical instrument, like an audio system, is a product of craftmanship? And that such craft practice will vary and individuate, and it's every man for himself in selecting his preferred instrument?
As I go around listening to some *very good* systems, I am always struck by how different they sound. Nor do I see any convergence -- they all have strengths and weaknesses, and respond to some sorts of music better than others. Is that so terrible?
More to the point of this thread, how has any of what we've learned from listening, direct us to a solution of "replicating the sound of that original event"? I suggest, no way.
clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- So you take issue with "...there is no right and wrong when judging art." OK, fine. but... - clarkjohnsen 11/15/0714:57:52 11/15/07 (3)
- RE: So you take issue with "...there is no right and wrong when judging art." OK, fine. but... - b.l.zeebub 06:27:56 11/16/07 (1)
- RE: So you take issue with "...there is no right and wrong when judging art." OK, fine. but... - morricab 03:30:34 11/18/07 (0)
- RE: So you take issue with "...there is no right and wrong when judging art." OK, fine. but... - morricab 15:32:55 11/15/07 (0)