In Reply to: RE: Question for Ryelands posted by Ryelands on January 3, 2010 at 13:00:35:
If a thread below (by chopper87@aol.com) about external drive vs. network is anything to go by, it could be interesting. Of course, everything should be optimized specifically for each option, which did not appear to be the case there.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Did anyone get a chance to compare the same otherwise setup "headed" vs. "headless"? - carcass93 01/3/1020:08:03 01/3/10 (26)
- RE: results of headed no network / headless with network - aljordan 19:38:01 01/6/10 (3)
- RE: results of headed no network / headless with network - Ryelands 23:06:45 01/6/10 (2)
- RE: results of headed no network / headless with network - aljordan 05:42:16 01/7/10 (1)
- RE: results of headed no network / headless with network - Ryelands 08:01:58 01/7/10 (0)
- RE: Did anyone get a chance to compare the same otherwise setup "headed" vs. "headless"? - aljordan 05:57:16 01/5/10 (20)
- RE: Did anyone get a chance to compare the same otherwise setup "headed" vs. "headless"? - Ryelands 07:31:15 01/5/10 (1)
- RE: Did anyone get a chance to compare the same otherwise setup "headed" vs. "headless"? - aljordan 09:32:33 01/5/10 (0)
- One (minor) thing to improve KVM setup - external power for keyboard and mouse (if they are used). - carcass93 07:30:52 01/5/10 (1)
- RE: One (minor) thing to improve KVM setup - external power for keyboard and mouse (if they are used). - aljordan 08:28:00 01/5/10 (0)
- Moving parts vs. no moving parts - Tony Lauck 07:26:16 01/5/10 (15)
- RE: Moving parts vs. no moving parts - Ryelands 08:23:29 01/5/10 (4)
- RE: Moving parts vs. no moving parts - aljordan 08:35:37 01/5/10 (3)
- RE: Moving parts vs. no moving parts - Ryelands 09:24:10 01/5/10 (2)
- RE: Moving parts vs. no moving parts - aljordan 18:24:42 01/5/10 (1)
- RE: Moving parts vs. no moving parts - Ryelands 03:49:36 01/6/10 (0)
- RE: Moving parts vs. no moving parts - aljordan 08:02:46 01/5/10 (9)
- RE: Moving parts vs. no moving parts - John Swenson 17:23:04 01/5/10 (8)
- RE: Moving parts vs. no moving parts - aljordan 18:20:25 01/5/10 (7)
- RE: Moving parts vs. no moving parts - Dawnrazor 20:17:30 01/5/10 (2)
- RE: Moving parts vs. no moving parts - aljordan 05:48:49 01/6/10 (1)
- RE: Moving parts vs. no moving parts - Dawnrazor 23:49:33 01/6/10 (0)
- RE: Moving parts vs. no moving parts - John Swenson 19:45:59 01/5/10 (3)
- RE: Moving parts vs. no moving parts - rick_m 07:08:34 01/6/10 (1)
- RE: Moving parts vs. no moving parts - John Swenson 13:08:43 01/6/10 (0)
- RE: Moving parts vs. no moving parts - aljordan 06:16:23 01/6/10 (0)
- RE: Did anyone get a chance to compare the same otherwise setup "headed" vs. "headless"? - Ryelands 04:49:00 01/4/10 (0)