Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
In Reply to: RE: "deliberate alteration of the signal as a goal" - where's evidence that it was a goal? posted by Phelonious Ponk on October 27, 2009 at 14:51:48:
... for "presence of a valve output stage" in your phrase constitutes true sentence, or may be even "truer" sentence than yours, for many people?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... - AudioDoctor 18:44:47 10/22/09 (103)
- RE: I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... - AudioDoctor 09:11:54 10/24/09 (1)
- I Like Both - Telynau 10:28:59 10/24/09 (0)
- Is this more than the new flavor of the month DAC? - mäç 17:31:38 10/23/09 (8)
- RE: Is this more than the new flavor of the month DAC? - AudioDoctor 17:38:20 10/23/09 (7)
- thanks - mäç 19:12:03 10/23/09 (6)
- RE: thanks - jtwrace 06:29:57 10/24/09 (5)
- RE: thanks - mäç 11:16:22 10/24/09 (4)
- RE: thanks - AbeCollins 15:56:50 10/24/09 (3)
- RE: thanks - mäç 19:22:26 10/24/09 (2)
- What "low jitter S/PDIF DAC" are you using w/ the Squeezebox ? -nt - AbeCollins 13:47:30 10/25/09 (1)
- Modified Cambridge DacMagic. (nt) - mäç 17:05:18 10/25/09 (0)
- RE: I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... - Dawnrazor 14:01:45 10/23/09 (20)
- RE: I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... - aljordan 19:03:07 10/23/09 (7)
- RE: I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... - AudioDoctor 21:39:45 10/23/09 (0)
- Thanks for stepping in with your comments: have you tried the - Sordidman 19:30:02 10/23/09 (5)
- RE: Thanks for stepping in with your comments: have you tried the - panhead 10:39:06 10/24/09 (1)
- Well....I bought the Stello with the Empirical - Sordidman 17:56:58 10/24/09 (0)
- RE: Thanks for stepping in with your comments: have you tried the - aljordan 05:21:58 10/24/09 (0)
- RE: Benchmark - restock 23:41:55 10/23/09 (1)
- So in order to listen to "real music" on the Benchmark - ForgotPassword 00:13:18 10/24/09 (0)
- RE: I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... - Mercman 15:14:07 10/23/09 (10)
- RE: I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... - aljordan 18:39:43 10/23/09 (6)
- RE: I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... - Mercman 14:48:23 10/24/09 (5)
- RE: I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... - AudioDoctor 17:50:43 10/24/09 (4)
- RE: I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... - Mercman 18:18:13 10/24/09 (3)
- RE: I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... - AudioDoctor 18:32:35 10/24/09 (2)
- Yes (nt) - Mercman 18:36:32 10/24/09 (1)
- RE: Yes (nt) - AudioDoctor 19:08:36 10/24/09 (0)
- RE: I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... - Dawnrazor 15:22:38 10/23/09 (2)
- RE: I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... - Mercman 15:31:18 10/23/09 (1)
- RE: I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... - Dawnrazor 18:01:02 10/23/09 (0)
- RE: I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... - AudioDoctor 14:46:01 10/23/09 (0)
- RE: I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... - StateRadioFan 09:39:46 10/23/09 (62)
- RE: I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... - AudioDoctor 10:15:45 10/23/09 (0)
- I'm sure he's not - but there are shitheads that DO suggest that, and much more. - carcass93 10:11:30 10/23/09 (60)
- Let's watch the wholesale 'name calling', please? - Chris Garrett 10:37:13 10/24/09 (6)
- Let me remind you something (since you seem to forget easily): - carcass93 11:50:08 10/24/09 (5)
- I'm getting complaints about you daily.... - Chris Garrett 14:56:14 10/27/09 (4)
- Patterns... - carcass93 18:41:08 10/27/09 (3)
- Are you referring to me? - Chris Garrett 21:06:55 10/27/09 (2)
- I've never understood the propensity for throwing stones... - carcass93 11:39:13 10/28/09 (1)
- Man...you need some help. - Chris Garrett 20:30:36 10/29/09 (0)
- RE: I'm sure he's not - but there are shitheads that DO suggest that, and much more. - cfmsp 11:44:52 10/23/09 (52)
- RE: I'm sure he's not - but there are shitheads that DO suggest that, and much more. - Phelonious Ponk 11:57:05 10/23/09 (51)
- RE: I'm sure he's not - but there are shitheads that DO suggest that, and much more. - cfmsp 14:01:25 10/23/09 (45)
- RE: I'm sure he's not - but there are shitheads that DO suggest that, and much more. - Phelonious Ponk 19:36:47 10/23/09 (44)
- RE: I don't think the Benchmark should be viewed as a benchmark... - aljordan 06:05:29 10/24/09 (30)
- RE: I don't think the Benchmark should be viewed as a benchmark... - Phelonious Ponk 06:45:43 10/24/09 (29)
- RE: I don't think the Benchmark should be viewed as a benchmark... - theaudiohobby 09:39:43 10/26/09 (14)
- RE: I don't think the Benchmark should be viewed as a benchmark... - Phelonious Ponk 15:27:22 10/26/09 (0)
- "deliberate alteration of the signal as a goal" - where's evidence that it was a goal? - carcass93 12:01:43 10/26/09 (12)
- RE: "deliberate alteration of the signal as a goal" - where's evidence that it was a goal? - Phelonious Ponk 15:50:18 10/26/09 (11)
- RE: "deliberate alteration of the signal as a goal" - where's evidence that it was a goal? - Ebit 22:12:30 10/26/09 (10)
- RE: "deliberate alteration of the signal as a goal" - where's evidence that it was a goal? - Phelonious Ponk 03:44:56 10/27/09 (8)
- RE: "deliberate alteration of the signal as a goal" - where's evidence that it was a goal? - aljordan 12:19:55 10/27/09 (7)
- RE: "deliberate alteration of the signal as a goal" - where's evidence that it was a goal? - Phelonious Ponk 14:51:48 10/27/09 (6)
- You do realize that substituting "resampling to 110 KHz" or "usage of op-amps in output stage"... - carcass93 10/27/0915:24:59 10/27/09 (3)
- RE: You do realize that substituting "resampling to 110 KHz" or "usage of op-amps in output stage"... - Phelonious Ponk 17:27:17 10/27/09 (2)
- Syntax is fine; message is anything but. - carcass93 18:59:33 10/27/09 (1)
- RE: Syntax is fine; message is anything but. - Phelonious Ponk 19:16:17 10/27/09 (0)
- RE: "deliberate alteration of the signal as a goal" - where's evidence that it was a goal? - aljordan 15:08:39 10/27/09 (1)
- RE: "deliberate alteration of the signal as a goal" - where's evidence that it was a goal? - Phelonious Ponk 17:14:08 10/27/09 (0)
- RE: "deliberate alteration of the signal as a goal" - where's evidence that it was a goal? - theaudiohobby 02:41:17 10/27/09 (0)
- You don't own one? That explains a lot. - carcass93 18:24:02 10/25/09 (12)
- RE: The answer to your question is in the thread - theaudiohobby 04:11:59 10/26/09 (11)
- Follow the context - that way, you could avoid your usual problem understanding. - carcass93 06:09:39 10/26/09 (10)
- RE: Follow the context - that way, you could avoid your usual problem understanding. - theaudiohobby 08:25:36 10/26/09 (9)
- Comeback? No - it's my attempt to deal... - carcass93 08:31:45 10/26/09 (8)
- RE: Comeback? No - it's my attempt to deal... - theaudiohobby 08:35:10 10/26/09 (7)
- I'm flattered - your #1, #2 and #3 posts in Computer Audio are responses to mine. - carcass93 09:02:42 10/26/09 (3)
- RE: A change of tact , trying your hand at a bit of obfuscation - theaudiohobby 09:15:41 10/26/09 (2)
- I have fun, believe me. I hope you don't mind that it's at your expense. N/T - carcass93 09:46:23 10/26/09 (1)
- RE: If your responses on propheads is anything to go by... - theaudiohobby 10:13:14 10/26/09 (0)
- I'm surprised you're so upset over it... But come back for more, anytime. - carcass93 08:48:28 10/26/09 (2)
- RE: I'm surprised you're so upset over it... - theaudiohobby 08:59:26 10/26/09 (1)
- Oops... add #4 to that - as articulated and useful as ever. N/T - carcass93 09:07:54 10/26/09 (0)
- RE: thanks for the clarification - aljordan 06:55:49 10/24/09 (0)
- Oh, but the Benchmark is colored - ForgotPassword 20:20:10 10/23/09 (12)
- RE: Oh, but the Benchmark is colored - Phelonious Ponk 21:03:04 10/23/09 (11)
- Cool. So you prefer the Benchmark's colorization. - ForgotPassword 21:30:39 10/23/09 (10)
- RE: Cool. So you prefer the Benchmark's colorization. - Phelonious Ponk 03:03:03 10/24/09 (9)
- If a piece of gear imparts its sonic signature to the system - ForgotPassword 03:32:58 10/24/09 (8)
- RE: If a piece of gear imparts its sonic signature to the system - cfmsp 08:11:47 10/24/09 (1)
- RE: If a piece of gear imparts its sonic signature to the system - rick_m 09:14:29 10/24/09 (0)
- RE: If a piece of gear imparts its sonic signature to the system - rick_m 05:41:53 10/24/09 (5)
- I agree mostly with what you said, especially "the one you like the best is the best". - ForgotPassword 06:42:01 10/24/09 (4)
- RE: I agree mostly with what you said, especially "the one you like the best is the best". - cfmsp 09:55:12 10/24/09 (0)
- RE: I agree mostly with what you said, especially "the one you like the best is the best". - Phelonious Ponk 08:37:39 10/24/09 (0)
- RE: "every time we add the Benchmark to a chain..." - rick_m 08:21:48 10/24/09 (1)
- RE: "every time we add the Benchmark to a chain..." - Mercman 08:33:26 10/24/09 (0)
- "performance against benchmarks" - what in the world are you talking about? - carcass93 13:22:16 10/23/09 (0)
- RE: I'm sure he's not - but there are shitheads that DO suggest that, and much more. - AudioDoctor 12:50:51 10/23/09 (1)
- RE: I'm sure he's not - but there are shitheads that DO suggest that, and much more. - Phelonious Ponk 19:31:00 10/23/09 (0)
- RE: I'm sure he's not - but there are shitheads that DO suggest that, and much more. - Mercman 12:28:24 10/23/09 (1)
- RE: I'm sure he's not - but there are shitheads that DO suggest that, and much more. - fmak 22:16:36 10/23/09 (0)
- Just remember about burnin - Gordon Rankin 06:27:11 10/23/09 (7)
- RE: Just remember about burnin - AudioDoctor 10:18:09 10/23/09 (5)
- RE: Just remember about burnin - Gordon Rankin 13:53:22 10/23/09 (1)
- RE: Just remember about burnin - AudioDoctor 13:59:17 10/23/09 (0)
- RE: Just remember about burnin - Mercman 10:22:39 10/23/09 (2)
- RE: Just remember about burnin - AudioDoctor 10:28:38 10/23/09 (1)
- RE: Just remember about burnin - Mercman 10:35:53 10/23/09 (0)
- RE: Just remember about burnin - AudioDoctor 08:31:52 10/23/09 (0)
Follow Ups
- You do realize that substituting "resampling to 110 KHz" or "usage of op-amps in output stage"... - carcass93 10/27/0915:24:59 10/27/09 (3)
- RE: You do realize that substituting "resampling to 110 KHz" or "usage of op-amps in output stage"... - Phelonious Ponk 17:27:17 10/27/09 (2)
- Syntax is fine; message is anything but. - carcass93 18:59:33 10/27/09 (1)
- RE: Syntax is fine; message is anything but. - Phelonious Ponk 19:16:17 10/27/09 (0)