In Reply to: RE: I wanted to get some time on my new Cosecant V3 before waxing enthusiastic about it, but... posted by AudioDoctor on October 24, 2009 at 09:11:54:
I have used both the Benchmark DAC1 USB and the Cosecant V.2 and V.3 (44.1/16 bit) extensively over the past year and I like them both.
To me, the biggest difference in sound is tubes versus transistors, though they obviously use very different DAC technologies. Yes, the Cosecant spends most of its time in my main system, but it is fun to swap the Benchmark in from time to time to hear the differences. To my ears, the Benchmark is not embarrassed by the comparison. It tends to have some of the typical solid state advantages over tubes (more "detailed," or probably emphasized, treble, better bass) but also the typical disadvantages (less of a feeling of "reality" -- some would say "warmth" -- not as relaxed -- in the midrange).
Not everyone has the money to spend on a $3000+ DAC -- but if you can afford the Benchmark (new or used), I don't think you can go too far wrong.
With the Benchmark, as with most transistor gear, you need to feed it the best power you can (I use a PS Audio Premier power regenerator)and use decent interconnects and speaker wire (I use Blue Jeans).
My main system is a highly resolving mostly tube setup (e.g., Audio Research LS 17 tube preamp and McIntosh 2102 tube amp), so I am pretty "biased" towards the modern high end tube sound -- but I still like the Benchmark and have no problem listening to it in a second, revealing system that uses, for example, Lowther PM5A speakers in Medallion cabinets.
Both the Benchmark and the Cosecant are well-engineered and reliable products that their manufacturers stand behind. In either case, if you have a significant issue or question you can discuss it with the man who designed the product.
Regards, J.C.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I Like Both - Telynau 10/24/0910:28:59 10/24/09 (0)