|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
|
|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Better duck under that desk; posted by Phelonious Ponk on August 5, 2009 at 19:46:58:
It's not that you SHOULD train yourself thus, it's that many audiophiles DO to one degree or another and as a result can distinguish what others don't. Some studies may have used more experienced people but that is a far cry from determining how trained each is and matching result to level of training. The point is that you doubt people distinguish with what you consider music what is distinguished with test tones. I say it depends on who, with what training, experience of that kind of music, etc, in addition to whether the test psychological set and conditions are conducive to it.
On a different level, you seem to foolishly claim you are the arbiter of what in the sound presented is the music and what is something else you find worthless or even negative. It's hard to see how hearing more can ever be worse than hearing less of what is presented. What you enjoy is an even more idiosyncratic matter. Some people enjoy the deafening most of all and dislike lower volumes that actually allow one to hear what's playing.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 08/5/0920:00:35 08/5/09 (2)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 03:56:22 08/6/09 (1)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 07:50:41 08/6/09 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
