In Reply to: RE: Better duck under that desk; posted by Ryelands on August 4, 2009 at 02:55:41:
"BTW, I don't get Tony's argument that the tests should have used a frequency more in line with RBCD parameters. As I see it, Kunchur was researching human hearing, not RBCD technology, and presumably (and certainly should have) chose his tones accordingly."I agree and would add that the only real problem here is concluding what humans can hear when listening to music, based on a study of the theoretical limits of human hearing when listening to test tones.
P
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 08/4/0905:05:49 08/4/09 (7)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 19:12:49 08/5/09 (4)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 19:46:58 08/5/09 (3)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 20:00:35 08/5/09 (2)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 03:56:22 08/6/09 (1)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 07:50:41 08/6/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Tony Lauck 17:40:32 08/5/09 (1)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 19:17:37 08/5/09 (0)