In Reply to: RE: Better duck under that desk; posted by riboge on August 3, 2009 at 07:56:07:
I get that he, and a few others here, think it is related to the subject. But unless I misunderstand, the subject is the viability of 16/44.1, a digital recording format, relative to higher-resolution formats (or were we thinking that square waves are superior to Redbook?). And yet the study they think is not only related, but provides evidence of the unacceptability of 16/44.1, contained no 16/44.1 (or higher res) recordings, no complete speaker or playback systems, no music. Perhaps the audibility of misaligned ribbons playing square waves is related tangentially to digital timing in some theoretical way we non-scientists are incapable of grasping, but it says nothing about what people actually do or do not hear when listening to real music on real systems. I am, once again, a bit stunned that anyone can even argue that it does.
P
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 08/3/0912:09:11 08/3/09 (17)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 14:42:51 08/3/09 (16)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 18:27:33 08/3/09 (15)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 19:46:06 08/3/09 (14)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 05:24:51 08/4/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 02:55:41 08/4/09 (12)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Tony Lauck 17:29:58 08/5/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 05:05:49 08/4/09 (7)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 19:12:49 08/5/09 (4)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 19:46:58 08/5/09 (3)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 20:00:35 08/5/09 (2)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 03:56:22 08/6/09 (1)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 07:50:41 08/6/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Tony Lauck 17:40:32 08/5/09 (1)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 19:17:37 08/5/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Werner 04:13:36 08/4/09 (2)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 07:59:20 08/5/09 (1)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Werner 23:19:23 08/5/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 06:26:29 08/10/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Werner 06:50:25 08/10/09 (0)