In Reply to: RE: Better duck under that desk; posted by Ryelands on August 3, 2009 at 01:05:50:
Yes, you're wrong to argue that listening to square waves on misaligned ribbons is more relevant to the perception of music reproduction than listening to music unsighted, regardless of the tedium of your objections. You are going to great lengths to discredit, perhaps justifiably, a series of listening tests that attempted to get to the actual comparative quality of 44.1 vs hi-res, while putting forth as evidence a study that made no such attempt and has no relevance to the subject whatsoever. It is, as you say, "your field." Perhaps you're right that the Meyer and Moran paper is useless. I'm sure it is, at least, inconclusive. So we have a debate in which the only data is the inconclusive and the irrelevant. I think we're done.P
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 08/3/0904:06:20 08/3/09 (21)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 04:40:30 08/3/09 (20)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 05:08:53 08/3/09 (19)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 07:56:07 08/3/09 (18)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 12:09:11 08/3/09 (17)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 14:42:51 08/3/09 (16)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 18:27:33 08/3/09 (15)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 19:46:06 08/3/09 (14)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 05:24:51 08/4/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 02:55:41 08/4/09 (12)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Tony Lauck 17:29:58 08/5/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 05:05:49 08/4/09 (7)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 19:12:49 08/5/09 (4)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 19:46:58 08/5/09 (3)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 20:00:35 08/5/09 (2)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 03:56:22 08/6/09 (1)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 07:50:41 08/6/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Tony Lauck 17:40:32 08/5/09 (1)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 19:17:37 08/5/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Werner 04:13:36 08/4/09 (2)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 07:59:20 08/5/09 (1)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Werner 23:19:23 08/5/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 06:26:29 08/10/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Werner 06:50:25 08/10/09 (0)