In Reply to: RE: Better duck under that desk; posted by Ryelands on August 2, 2009 at 06:00:31:
"Kuchner demonstrated that humans can detect differences in percepts that cannot be resolved by 44.1 KHz recordings."
Please go back to the Kunchur papers. He did NOT demonstrate that.
He demonstrated two things about auditory perception, things that may
be new (then again, maybe not). However, there is no experimental
evidence, formal proof, or any founded reasoning in the papers that this
indicates a problem with 44.1kHz sampling. There is only, in the
conclusion of one paper, Kunchur's *claim* that this is so. That's all,
and that's *not* sufficient.
And then you wake up and realise that your classmates of old ... are running most of the TV shows.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Werner 08/2/0906:48:18 08/2/09 (25)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 07:16:17 08/2/09 (24)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 18:22:52 08/2/09 (23)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 01:05:50 08/3/09 (22)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 04:06:20 08/3/09 (21)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 04:40:30 08/3/09 (20)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 05:08:53 08/3/09 (19)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 07:56:07 08/3/09 (18)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 12:09:11 08/3/09 (17)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 14:42:51 08/3/09 (16)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 18:27:33 08/3/09 (15)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 19:46:06 08/3/09 (14)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 05:24:51 08/4/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 02:55:41 08/4/09 (12)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Tony Lauck 17:29:58 08/5/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 05:05:49 08/4/09 (7)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 19:12:49 08/5/09 (4)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 19:46:58 08/5/09 (3)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 20:00:35 08/5/09 (2)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 03:56:22 08/6/09 (1)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 07:50:41 08/6/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Tony Lauck 17:40:32 08/5/09 (1)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 19:17:37 08/5/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Werner 04:13:36 08/4/09 (2)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 07:59:20 08/5/09 (1)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Werner 23:19:23 08/5/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 06:26:29 08/10/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Werner 06:50:25 08/10/09 (0)