In Reply to: RE: Better duck under that desk; posted by deskducker on July 31, 2009 at 10:32:13:
Problem is that the only accepted and allowable viewpoint is subjectivism; objectivism and scientific method is, perversely, ironically, treated as junk science, as voodoo, and with the same disdain as doggy doo on new Ferragamos. Thing is, objectivism and scientific approach has the potential to eradicate the subjectivists' reason for being--constant comparison of equipment, or audiophilia for equipment's sake. Pure subjectivists' primary public service is that they keep Audiogon full of fine gear at cheap prices.
I rarely, if ever, wade into any such debates; pointless.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Kristian 07/31/0910:52:43 07/31/09 (33)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Werner 22:46:23 07/31/09 (31)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 04:35:48 08/1/09 (30)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 09:11:52 08/1/09 (29)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 10:13:02 08/1/09 (28)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 20:01:03 08/1/09 (27)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 06:00:31 08/2/09 (26)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Werner 06:48:18 08/2/09 (25)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 07:16:17 08/2/09 (24)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 18:22:52 08/2/09 (23)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 01:05:50 08/3/09 (22)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 04:06:20 08/3/09 (21)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 04:40:30 08/3/09 (20)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 05:08:53 08/3/09 (19)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 07:56:07 08/3/09 (18)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 12:09:11 08/3/09 (17)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 14:42:51 08/3/09 (16)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 18:27:33 08/3/09 (15)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 19:46:06 08/3/09 (14)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 05:24:51 08/4/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 02:55:41 08/4/09 (12)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Tony Lauck 17:29:58 08/5/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 05:05:49 08/4/09 (7)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 19:12:49 08/5/09 (4)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 19:46:58 08/5/09 (3)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 20:00:35 08/5/09 (2)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 03:56:22 08/6/09 (1)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - riboge 07:50:41 08/6/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Tony Lauck 17:40:32 08/5/09 (1)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 19:17:37 08/5/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Werner 04:13:36 08/4/09 (2)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 07:59:20 08/5/09 (1)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Werner 23:19:23 08/5/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Ryelands 06:26:29 08/10/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Werner 06:50:25 08/10/09 (0)
- RE: Better duck under that desk; - Phelonious Ponk 18:15:04 07/31/09 (0)