Unfortunately I listen to real life implementations, not theory (nt)

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - SRC or straight 16/44.1? - audiogremlin 06:30:03 03/6/09 (54)

RE: SRC or straight 16/44.1? - mmarvin19@aol.com 02:37:04 03/7/09 (1)

Keep fiddling around, - Squonk 09:37:24 03/7/09 (0)

Interpolation error is audible - cics 01:50:38 03/7/09 (13)

RE: Interpolation error is audible - Tony Lauck 12:30:12 03/7/09 (12)

RE: Interpolation error is audible - cics 08:54:04 03/8/09 (11)

Your graphs are very optimistic - Christine Tham 17:16:53 03/10/09 (2)

No need for optimism, just the facts - cics 08:45:23 03/11/09 (0)

RE: Your graphs are very optimistic - Tony Lauck 20:13:02 03/10/09 (0)

Undithered? - Tony Lauck 12:19:11 03/8/09 (5)

Basic dithering & noise shaping. More interesting tests... - cics 11:18:47 03/10/09 (4)

Your noise, not mine. I was looking at your graphs. - Tony Lauck 12:26:08 03/10/09 (3)

Noise is that of upsampler conversion testing. Some 16/44.1 tests (pure 1kHz tone)... - cics 17:12:23 03/10/09 (2)

RE: Noise is that of upsampler conversion testing. Some 16/44.1 tests (pure 1kHz tone)... - Tony Lauck 18:18:35 03/10/09 (1)

RE: Noise is that of upsampler conversion testing. Some 16/44.1 tests (pure 1kHz tone)... - cics 09:10:35 03/11/09 (0)

Limitations of the Null Test - Tony Lauck 11:27:59 03/8/09 (1)

RE: Limitations of the Null Test - Christine Tham 17:25:01 03/10/09 (0)

Thumbs down on upsampling... - Scrith 11:23:04 03/6/09 (11)

RE: Thumbs down on upsampling...No - fmak 16:22:16 03/6/09 (0)

RE: Thumbs down on upsampling... - Tony Lauck 13:26:11 03/6/09 (9)

RE: Thumbs down on upsampling... - Dawnrazor 15:49:23 03/6/09 (8)

RE: Thumbs down on upsampling... - Tony Lauck 18:06:53 03/6/09 (0)

I've played with the minimum phase filter on RX advanced ... - Christine Tham 16:05:21 03/6/09 (6)

RE: I've played with the minimum phase filter on RX advanced ... - Telstar 10:52:57 03/8/09 (5)

RE: I've played with the minimum phase filter on RX advanced ... - Christine Tham 13:44:47 03/9/09 (4)

I dislike delta-sigma DACs, therefore... - Telstar 14:08:34 03/9/09 (3)

RE: I dislike delta-sigma DACs, therefore... - Christine Tham 15:41:17 03/9/09 (2)

RE: I dislike delta-sigma DACs, therefore... - Telstar 16:18:27 03/9/09 (1)

RE: I dislike delta-sigma DACs, therefore... - Christine Tham 17:07:41 03/9/09 (0)

I have use SRC and SOX but prefer 16/44.1 - Dynaudio_Rules 06:34:19 03/6/09 (25)

RE: I have use SRC and SOX but prefer 16/44.1 - audiogremlin 06:51:57 03/6/09 (24)

RE: I have use SRC and SOX but prefer 16/44.1 - theob 07:01:32 03/6/09 (23)

An even better test - Christine Tham 16:16:44 03/6/09 (22)

I don't see where that proves anything - hermanesque 17:40:31 03/6/09 (21)

My cognitive dissonance with this post goes very high. - Ugly 07:15:40 03/7/09 (2)

RE: My cognitive dissonance with this post goes very high. - Tony Lauck 11:51:58 03/7/09 (1)

I guess some of these SRC programmers fancy themselves the artsy type. - Ugly 14:23:34 03/7/09 (0)

Who's theory is that? Shannon (nt) - Christine Tham 18:44:46 03/6/09 (17)

Don't forget Harry! - Tony Lauck 19:53:09 03/6/09 (2)

Unfortunately I listen to real life implementations, not theory (nt) - Christine Tham 03/6/0922:23:29 03/6/09 (1)

"Sounds OK to me" considered harmful. - Tony Lauck 09:47:18 03/7/09 (0)

I don't see where any of his theories state you must be able to replicate the original data for it to sound good /nt - hermanesque 19:30:35 03/6/09 (13)

The original posted asked which one was more *accurate* - Christine Tham 20:56:29 03/6/09 (12)

you clearly misinterpreted the intent of the original post - hermanesque 21:07:34 03/6/09 (11)

What does "better sound" mean to you? - Christine Tham 22:12:35 03/6/09 (10)

Ah, I see you are a lawyer, you can twist this any way you want but - hermanesque 22:31:56 03/6/09 (9)

You didn't really answer the question. - Christine Tham 22:43:21 03/6/09 (8)

Not exactly, I don't neccesarily correlate the 2 - hermanesque 08:14:12 03/7/09 (7)

What is "accurate" in an upsampling DAC? (very long) - Tony Lauck 11:44:18 03/7/09 (6)

RE: What is "accurate" in an upsampling DAC? (very long) - Telstar 11:07:24 03/8/09 (5)

I don't think super high accuracy SRCs are pratical except off line. - Tony Lauck 12:01:03 03/8/09 (4)

RE: I don't think super high accuracy SRCs are pratical except off line. - Telstar 16:25:23 03/8/09 (3)

RE: I don't think super high accuracy SRCs are pratical except off line. - Tony Lauck 18:04:53 03/8/09 (2)

RE: I don't think super high accuracy SRCs are pratical except off line. - Telstar 05:34:14 03/9/09 (1)

RE: I don't think super high accuracy SRCs are pratical except off line. - Tony Lauck 10:09:12 03/9/09 (0)

Follow Ups

Unfortunately I listen to real life implementations, not theory (nt) - Christine Tham 03/6/0922:23:29 03/6/09 (1)

"Sounds OK to me" considered harmful. - Tony Lauck 09:47:18 03/7/09 (0)

Post a Message!