In Reply to: And 5G is hot on their tail too... posted by AbeCollins on June 14, 2021 at 17:13:36:
I'm not a big cell phone user, but I do use the speaker phone mode most often as I don't particularly like the idea of sticking it next to my head whether it may cause brain cancer or not.
Fiber is far more effective, but the economics will surely advantage 5G. Just don't put a tower near me!
Thousands of studies link low-level wireless radio frequencyradiation exposures to a long list of adverse biological effects,including:
- DNA single and double strand breaks
- oxidative damagedisruption of cell metabolism
- increasedblood brain barrier permeability
- melatonin reduction
- disruption to brain glucose metabolism
- generation of stress proteins
Let's not also forget that in 2011 theWorld HealthOrganization(WHO) classified radio frequency radiation as apossible 2B carcinogen
-Rod
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Do we need electromagnetic radiation bombardment... - Rod M 06/14/2117:43:57 06/14/21 (2)
- RE: Do we need electromagnetic radiation bombardment... - AbeCollins 06:37:08 06/15/21 (1)
- RE: Do we need electromagnetic radiation bombardment... - Bob_C 13:44:22 06/16/21 (0)