In Reply to: RE: Objectively same posted by fmak on May 1, 2017 at 22:04:22:
"If you understand measurement principles, you would not have asked this question."
Either that or if you for once in your life posted some evidence with your claims that indicate you actually have some basis for making the claim....lol
Which FFT software and ADC's. Are you willing to share any screen captures which demonstrate this superiority?
I'm still very skeptical you can exceed the resolution of Archimagos posted results with your software and gear and will remain so until you demonstrate otherwise. This all based on your history of BS claims with no evidence or substance to back any of it. Until you post screen shots of your results I'm assuming they are just too embarrassing for you to reveal.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Objectively same - Ugly 05/2/1707:17:04 05/2/17 (9)
- exceed the resolution of Archimagos posted results - fmak 11:51:54 05/2/17 (8)
- lol. Is your last name Astaire? - Ugly 11:58:42 05/2/17 (7)
- What is his idea of 'proper' ? - AbeCollins 20:01:06 05/4/17 (6)
- RE: What is his idea of 'proper' ? - fmak 22:17:29 05/4/17 (5)
- RE: What is his idea of 'proper' ? - Ugly 14:11:16 05/5/17 (0)
- RE: What is his idea of 'proper' ? - AbeCollins 23:38:23 05/4/17 (3)
- Being Specific? - fmak 02:26:30 05/5/17 (2)
- RE: Being Specific? - AbeCollins 12:04:35 05/6/17 (1)
- RE: Being Specific?Sense - fmak 07:21:25 05/22/17 (0)