In Reply to: Objectively same posted by fmak on May 1, 2017 at 03:53:43:
As compared to what, your measurements? Archimagos captures are cleaner than most who use similar technique. But since you brought it up, please state the required resolution required of results from such setups in order to meet the fmak threshold of "enough" resolution to be a data set which could be a case considered worthy of your analysis.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Objectively same - Ugly 05/1/1711:26:34 05/1/17 (11)
- RE: Objectively same - fmak 22:04:22 05/1/17 (10)
- RE: Objectively same - Ugly 07:17:04 05/2/17 (9)
- exceed the resolution of Archimagos posted results - fmak 11:51:54 05/2/17 (8)
- lol. Is your last name Astaire? - Ugly 11:58:42 05/2/17 (7)
- What is his idea of 'proper' ? - AbeCollins 20:01:06 05/4/17 (6)
- RE: What is his idea of 'proper' ? - fmak 22:17:29 05/4/17 (5)
- RE: What is his idea of 'proper' ? - Ugly 14:11:16 05/5/17 (0)
- RE: What is his idea of 'proper' ? - AbeCollins 23:38:23 05/4/17 (3)
- Being Specific? - fmak 02:26:30 05/5/17 (2)
- RE: Being Specific? - AbeCollins 12:04:35 05/6/17 (1)
- RE: Being Specific?Sense - fmak 07:21:25 05/22/17 (0)