In Reply to: RE: Adversarial, really? RE: The procedure... RE: You would have to buy a CD(s), if I understand you correctly. posted by Tony Lauck on December 7, 2012 at 10:38:33:
> IMO, it's not worthwhile arguing about such a small benefit or even taking the time to conduct experiments. [320 KBS vs. lossless files.]
Such a comparison would be of use to me:
- I use a 80GB iPod and a 32 GB USB flash drive for music in our cars. That capacity goes a lot farther with MP3 files than with Flac or WAV. So how much difference is there in that environment?
- Some music is only available or only available at a reasonable price as MP3 or AAC downloads now. My willingness to settle for a lossy compressed download instead of a CD depends on my sense of the differences.
I can do my own comparisons but I'd be happy to hear the results of some blind tests.
Bill
my blog: http://carsmusicandnature.blogspot.com/
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Adversarial, really? RE: The procedure... RE: You would have to buy a CD(s), if I understand you correctly. - Old Listener 12/7/1211:54:24 12/7/12 (1)
- RE: Adversarial, really? RE: The procedure... RE: You would have to buy a CD(s), if I understand you correctly. - Tony Lauck 12:02:50 12/7/12 (0)