In Reply to: Take the LAME recommendations with a grain of salt. posted by rick_m on May 31, 2007 at 22:38:29:
sounds awfully good. Danny Kaey of Positive Feedback Online is writing an article about this codec, I am told, and hopefully it will be published soon.
Danny made a CD-R of various codecs for me to listen to a few months ago. All tracks were error-corrected prior to burning. Included were WAV, LAME 320 and LAME 320 hi-rez. Without a doubt, the LAME 320 (non hi-rez) was the best sounding of all....fuller and more natural-sounding, far more so than the original error-corrected WAV track. All tracks were ripped and encoded via Poikosoft.
Food for thought.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: LAME 320.... - alan m. kafton 06/1/0702:42:43 06/1/07 (3)
- RE: LAME 320 sounds awfully good. - rick_m 08:56:40 06/1/07 (2)
- FYI - to eliminate sw issues, the tracks were copied onto CDR... - danny kaey 10:02:11 06/1/07 (1)
- Even then software issues lurk. - rick_m 10:45:22 06/1/07 (0)