In Reply to: But that doesn't mean they always sound as good... posted by rick_m on May 28, 2007 at 16:45:20:
Fair enough, but thats not a problem with the file, thats a problem with the computer your using for playback.
Given the parallels that I've drawn above, thats like being able to download the .exe of a program your computer is not capable of running. It happens all the time, but it doesn't mean there's a problem with the program.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: But that doesn't mean they always sound as good... - kgiessler 05/28/0717:53:29 05/28/07 (9)
- Precisely.. - rick_m 20:22:10 05/28/07 (8)
- RE: Precisely.. - kgiessler 20:34:56 05/28/07 (7)
- RE: Precisely.. - JimOfOakCreek 08:38:02 05/29/07 (6)
- RE: Precisely.. - Dawnrazor 08:16:55 05/31/07 (5)
- Take the LAME recommendations with a grain of salt. - rick_m 22:38:29 05/31/07 (4)
- RE: LAME 320.... - alan m. kafton 02:42:43 06/1/07 (3)
- RE: LAME 320 sounds awfully good. - rick_m 08:56:40 06/1/07 (2)
- FYI - to eliminate sw issues, the tracks were copied onto CDR... - danny kaey 10:02:11 06/1/07 (1)
- Even then software issues lurk. - rick_m 10:45:22 06/1/07 (0)