In Reply to: Formats be Damned posted by dtz on May 28, 2007 at 12:27:34:
> I've read alot about lossless compression as good as uncompressed. I
> don't buy that.
Apparently you haven't read enough.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Formats be Damned - J.Mac 05/28/0713:26:04 05/28/07 (19)
- Well said - kgiessler 15:37:24 05/28/07 (18)
- RE: Well said - rick_m 21:35:33 05/28/07 (0)
- But that doesn't mean they always sound as good... - rick_m 16:45:20 05/28/07 (16)
- RE: But that doesn't mean they always sound as good... - maabx 05:50:38 05/29/07 (5)
- RE: But that doesn't mean they always sound as good... - Dawnrazor 06:44:09 05/29/07 (4)
- Lossless should sound a lot bettern than uncompressed - Scrith 13:00:02 05/29/07 (2)
- Testing between WAV and FLAC - John Swenson 15:26:46 05/30/07 (1)
- RE: Testing between WAV and FLAC - Scrith 14:34:57 06/1/07 (0)
- RE: But that doesn't mean they always sound as good... - maabx 07:09:53 05/29/07 (0)
- RE: But that doesn't mean they always sound as good... - kgiessler 17:53:29 05/28/07 (9)
- Precisely.. - rick_m 20:22:10 05/28/07 (8)
- RE: Precisely.. - kgiessler 20:34:56 05/28/07 (7)
- RE: Precisely.. - JimOfOakCreek 08:38:02 05/29/07 (6)
- RE: Precisely.. - Dawnrazor 08:16:55 05/31/07 (5)
- Take the LAME recommendations with a grain of salt. - rick_m 22:38:29 05/31/07 (4)
- RE: LAME 320.... - alan m. kafton 02:42:43 06/1/07 (3)
- RE: LAME 320 sounds awfully good. - rick_m 08:56:40 06/1/07 (2)
- FYI - to eliminate sw issues, the tracks were copied onto CDR... - danny kaey 10:02:11 06/1/07 (1)
- Even then software issues lurk. - rick_m 10:45:22 06/1/07 (0)