In Reply to: RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? posted by RhythmDevil on June 22, 2015 at 06:49:08:
I was being facetious to make a point about how "objectivist" audio nerds make a hobby out of demanding that everyone stick to a minimum acceptable standard from 30+ years ago, while nobody seems to make an issue out of the megapixel race.
To play the devil's advocate, a 1920x1080 display is only 2MP, and 4MP is enough to produce a high quality 8x10 print. So I was going to argue that the only use case requiring greater than 4MP resolution is in producing professional quality large format prints. You brought up a good point about digital zoom. But even still, modern digital SLRs are limited by their optics rather than their sensor resolution. The last time I researched lenses was a couple years ago, so my info may be a little out of date, but I recall that I would need to spend around $1k for a fixed FX portrait lens to take advantage of the 12MP sensor resolution of my wife's Nikon D90. A good fast zoom lens might achieve something like 8MP equivalent resolution, while a typical consumer wide zoom would be 4-6MP. So it is a bit eye rolling to see 50+ megapixel DSLRs on the market now, and my wife even has a 41MP sensor in her phone!
In audio, we have people who seemingly make it their life's work to prevent adoption of a digital audio standard better than CD. In the photography world, there are some people who find the megapixel war to be pointless and amusing, but I don't hear of people trolling digital photography forums demanding that hobbyists perform DBTs to prove their latest gear is better.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Dave_K 06/22/1510:31:28 06/22/15 (20)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Tony Lauck 10:28:11 06/23/15 (16)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Dave_K 10:53:42 06/24/15 (15)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Jaundiced Ear 20:18:23 06/24/15 (14)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Dave_K 13:51:28 06/25/15 (4)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Jaundiced Ear 19:33:05 06/25/15 (0)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Abstraction 14:54:01 06/25/15 (2)
- I don't think that's true - Dave_K 04:00:04 06/26/15 (1)
- RE: I don't think that's true - Abstraction 07:09:33 06/26/15 (0)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Tony Lauck 08:15:54 06/25/15 (8)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Jaundiced Ear 19:38:16 06/25/15 (0)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Abstraction 09:52:19 06/25/15 (6)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Tony Lauck 10:43:23 06/25/15 (5)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Abstraction 11:12:13 06/25/15 (3)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - fmak 22:03:35 06/25/15 (0)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Tony Lauck 12:00:59 06/25/15 (1)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Abstraction 12:06:16 06/25/15 (0)
- Exactly (nt) - Dave_K 11:07:18 06/25/15 (0)
- Well said - fmak 07:33:22 06/23/15 (0)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - RhythmDevil 11:20:28 06/22/15 (1)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Dave_K 10:31:12 06/24/15 (0)