In Reply to: RE: Wavelength Crimson posted by Phelonious Ponk on May 25, 2010 at 15:01:48:
"...many legitimate sources who disagree and, FWIW, the available data is on their side, so it is just that -- your opinion."That you declare the sources legitimate is ALSO JUST AN OPINION, and that they may have some 'data' supporting their opinion (does not mean that all data supports their opinion) that you declare is "on their side" still only makes it AN OPINION. :)
In the absence of unequivocal data that we all can agree on, it's all just opinions, so what's your point?
"I think it's best if we don't couch our subjective opinions in false objective language."You suggested a couple of times that you don't like the use of objective language mixed up with subjective opinions.
John has provided objective test results that back up his statement. Are these not considered objective (or legitimate) by you?
clay
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Wavelength Crimson - cfmsp 05/25/1015:59:51 05/25/10 (0)