In Reply to: RE: Wavelength Crimson posted by Phelonious Ponk on May 25, 2010 at 04:41:39:
"-- Really, the only point I'm trying to make is that once you're talking about "a disservice to the actual sound," or anything similar, you are back into subjective, theoretical territory, and statements like "lowest distortion" no longer belong in the conversation."
Of course it's subjective, otherwise how can we know/agree that it sounds like 'real music'?
sounds like you're saying that as long as the distortion is measured to be lower it has to sound more like the input, irrespective of the impacts on the actual sound of the different types of distortion generated by different types of output devices?
If so, we don't have a basis for further discussion. You can't just measure your way to achieving great sound, IMHO.
clay
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Wavelength Crimson - cfmsp 05/25/1005:19:27 05/25/10 (5)
- You can't just measure your way to achieving great sound, IMHO. - Dynaudio_Rules 06:33:30 05/25/10 (0)
- RE: Wavelength Crimson - Phelonious Ponk 06:08:57 05/25/10 (0)
- RE: Wavelength Crimson - Mercman 06:03:17 05/25/10 (0)
- RE: Wavelength Crimson - Ryelands 06:02:50 05/25/10 (1)
- RE: Wavelength Crimson - Phelonious Ponk 15:05:38 05/25/10 (0)