In Reply to: RE: 'IMO, SPDIF from a computer would be the last method of connectivity to use as far as digital connections. posted by maabx on March 19, 2008 at 20:23:43:
I read the test results on these de-jittering devices. Not very good results IMO. It seems to me that the test set-up must have had a fairly bad ground-loop of some kind as all of the wired results were actually worse than the original jitter. Only the Toslinks seemed better.The Theta TLC evidently has a transformer coupling the S/PDIF output, but like many manufacturers, it is wired as an auto-transformer which eliminates the galvanic isolation. It sounds a lot like the DDDAC which uses a free-running oscillator and an 8412 or 8414. The way this works is that as it "precesses", it throws away samples from the input stream to avoid sync problems. Not bit-perfect, but one way to sync the stream to an asynchronous clock.
These results are actually not so great - 0.5 nsec to 1 nsec of jitter. The risetimes of some of these are 2-3 nsec, so the jitter should not be this high. Probably a result of using inexpensive oscillators, or at least not the best choices IMO.
Steve N.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: 'IMO, SPDIF from a computer would be the last method of connectivity to use as far as digital connections. - audioengr 03/19/0823:14:25 03/19/08 (9)
- RE: 'IMO, SPDIF from a computer would be the last method of connectivity to use as far as digital connections. - maabx 06:14:24 03/20/08 (8)
- RE: 'IMO, SPDIF from a computer would be the last method of connectivity to use as far as digital connections. - audioengr 10:53:56 03/20/08 (7)
- Well Steve, looks like the Theta does not drop samples after all... - maabx 16:30:49 03/20/08 (1)
- RE: Well Steve, looks like the Theta does not drop samples after all... - audioengr 22:24:23 03/20/08 (0)
- 'Ultra-low jitter in my book is 10's of picoseconds, not 1nsec' - maabx 11:50:01 03/20/08 (4)
- RE: 'Ultra-low jitter in my book is 10's of picoseconds, not 1nsec' - audioengr 22:29:06 03/20/08 (3)
- RE: 'Ultra-low jitter in my book is 10's of picoseconds, not 1nsec' - maabx 07:14:22 03/21/08 (2)
- RE: 'Ultra-low jitter in my book is 10's of picoseconds, not 1nsec' - audioengr 11:32:09 03/21/08 (1)
- Thanks Steve. -t - maabx 14:42:29 03/21/08 (0)