In Reply to: That is a little troublesome posted by PabloP on March 16, 2007 at 08:43:21:
Anyone she had contact with on any of her trips will have been examined by "interested parties" already. The info is stale and has no operational impact any more. Its importance now is legal.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- People she met were already blown. - GliderGuider 03/16/0708:45:19 03/16/07 (12)
- I don't like it - it seems self-serving - PabloP 08:50:10 03/16/07 (11)
- "she could have declined to answer that question." Probably yes, but...why should she? (nt) - orejones 09:56:50 03/16/07 (7)
- because it hadn't been disclosed - PabloP 10:11:26 03/16/07 (6)
- Once she became "public", everything she´s done sure has been scrutinized by those interested..., - orejones 10:33:32 03/16/07 (3)
- You're assuming there were any consequences in the first place - PabloP 10:46:30 03/16/07 (2)
- One minute, please: what I said was that, once the beans were spilled by the untergangsters, her job was no secret ... - orejones 12:21:19 03/16/07 (0)
- We have to assume the CIA gave their approval for this disclosure. - GliderGuider 10:57:15 03/16/07 (0)
- Doesn't matter - GliderGuider 10:27:34 03/16/07 (1)
- I was answerng the question; your opinion is well known and unfounded - PabloP 10:29:33 03/16/07 (0)
- Nope. It was needeed to counter the RW spin that she wasn't covert. - GliderGuider 08:56:07 03/16/07 (2)
- Re: Nope. It was needeed to counter the RW spin that she wasn't covert. - middleground 09:43:31 03/16/07 (1)
- Yeah, and according to Ann Coulter it was with Canada's help... * - GliderGuider 09:44:51 03/16/07 (0)