In Reply to: 15,500 scientists posted by LWR on February 6, 2007 at 07:36:49:
What's their definition of a "scientist", beyond someone who signs their petition? I found the following on a page about the petition:Some 16,000 scientists, two thirds of whom have advanced degrees, including over 6000 with Ph.D.s in science, have signed a petition that states,
So 6,000 of this 15,500 claim to have PhDs in some unspecified "Science" or other. I wonder who peer reviewed their participation in this "Project"? Sorry, this is pathetically transparent. What weight should I give to the opinion someone with a degree in neurology or behavioral science who just puts a signature on an Internet petition compared to that of a full time climatologist or atmospheric physicist who publishes their work in a reviewed journal? I'll put my trust in the IPCC scientists. Their report was heavily peer reviewed, while this is just bullshit debunkery, Binky.
Why do you waste out time with this shit?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: 15,500 "scientists" - GliderGuider 02/6/0707:57:39 02/6/07 (11)
- Global Warming is a false religion based on junk science. - Conner2 09:18:26 02/6/07 (0)
- You always run away from truth - Victor Khomenko 08:06:40 02/6/07 (1)
- Re: You always run away from truth - Jeff Starrs 08:33:41 02/6/07 (0)
- If you had actually read the explanation at the link I posted you would know a bit more - LWR 08:01:14 02/6/07 (7)
- Sheer bullshit: read the link in my post, and learn about the high credentials of your guys... (nt) - orejones 08:30:07 02/6/07 (1)
- As pointed out at my link - LWR 08:35:41 02/6/07 (0)
- Science is not conducted by petition. * - GliderGuider 08:23:11 02/6/07 (4)
- The Global Warming Folly - LWR 08:37:22 02/6/07 (3)
- Is that the best you've got? - GliderGuider 08:52:04 02/6/07 (2)
- Credentialed enought to go before a US Senate Commitee. - LWR 09:00:34 02/6/07 (1)
- Good enough? Nope. - GliderGuider 09:18:44 02/6/07 (0)