Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - A temperature map of last December - GliderGuider 08:37:38 01/18/07 (56)

• Well, there's temperatury maps and there's temperature records. - HiFi Guy 09:24:35 01/18/07 (53)
• Would the whole World could be Roan Mnt, Tenn, but 2006 was the warmest on record - Bambi B 10:44:29 01/18/07 (3)
• According to Glider 5C "fits the model" so expect a 250C increase by end of century - Victor Khomenko 12:34:43 01/18/07 (0)
• Re: Would the whole World could be Roan Mnt, Tenn, but 2006 was the warmest on record - HiFi Guy 12:24:05 01/18/07 (0)
• Really good response, but it simply blew over the head of Larry - PriyaW 11:19:29 01/18/07 (0)
• C'mon, man, let him have his 15 seconds... Hard data always kills joy. (nt) - Victor Khomenko 09:31:53 01/18/07 (25)
• Not for me. Look at the graph closely... - Revolver66 09:44:45 01/18/07 (2)
• Comparing one year's mean with a 30 year mean is called junk science. - HiFi Guy 09:53:12 01/18/07 (1)
• Sure. And deriving global data from what happens in a hole lost in the mountains may earn the Nobel Prize...(nt) - orejones 10:41:08 01/18/07 (1)
• Those schlubs at NOAA - what do they know about climate anyway? * - GliderGuider 09:35:40 01/18/07 (21)
• For V ictor to believe, a private company should spend their $$ and prove December 2006 unusually warm - PriyaW 11:29:49 01/18/07 (0)
• Not much. Seeing things and understanding them are two big differences, as they say in Odessa - Victor Khomenko 09:51:09 01/18/07 (19)
• All this was, was data. - GliderGuider 01/18/0710:02:39 01/18/07 (18)
• You want to compare a 30 year mean for the month of December? - HiFi Guy 10:16:52 01/18/07 (16)
• Why? They're not saying this map proves global warming, and neither am I. - GliderGuider 10:27:48 01/18/07 (15)
• You sure did, and now you are trying to have it both ways - Victor Khomenko 11:35:43 01/18/07 (14)
• "The observation fits the model" is not "evidence". - GliderGuider 12:25:34 01/18/07 (12)
• The observation most definitely DOES NOT fit the model, sorry to inform you - Victor Khomenko 12:31:34 01/18/07 (11)
• The specific temperature is not the determinant. - GliderGuider 12:48:10 01/18/07 (10)
• LOL! You are a slippery bastard! - Victor Khomenko 13:02:09 01/18/07 (9)
• Re: LOL! You are a slippery bastard! - GliderGuider 13:29:58 01/18/07 (8)
• "at least as far as virtually all climate scientists are concerned." Incorrect again - Victor Khomenko 14:02:05 01/18/07 (7)
• Would 98.5% count as "virtually all"? - GliderGuider 14:18:31 01/18/07 (6)
• At some point there was one Galileo - Victor Khomenko 14:39:14 01/18/07 (5)
• The Oreskes study - GliderGuider 14:46:46 01/18/07 (4)
• I already told you the consensus doesn't matter... why continue beating dead scientist? - Victor Khomenko 14:49:53 01/18/07 (3)
• You suggested Oreskes' study had been discredited - GliderGuider 15:00:33 01/18/07 (2)
• Forgot to add - consensus is nothing but an opinion... science is supposed to be about facts - Victor Khomenko 15:52:00 01/18/07 (0)
• Lemme now say it in Russian - the consensus doesn't matter - Victor Khomenko 15:49:38 01/18/07 (0)
• At least he got one data point. How may data points you got to prove "life begins at conception?" (nt) - PriyaW 12:02:36 01/18/07 (0)
• Not really... you claimed down below that it fit some sort of a GW model... that is kaka. - Victor Khomenko 10:05:36 01/18/07 (0)
• Whatever you say, Larry. By the way, - GliderGuider 09:29:31 01/18/07 (22)
• The same variations in Record Highs and Lows vs the year they occured can be found anywhere in the world. - HiFi Guy 09:38:47 01/18/07 (21)
• You are so back asswards, that it could potentially create a rift in the space-time continuum. * - gme109 10:03:13 01/18/07 (0)
• Do you really want to argue this? - GliderGuider 09:58:12 01/18/07 (19)
• Re: Do you really want to argue this? - Victor Khomenko 10:04:12 01/18/07 (18)
• Nice bit of quote-mining. - GliderGuider 10:17:00 01/18/07 (17)
• Running away from the truth? - Victor Khomenko 11:25:44 01/18/07 (14)
• Lord you're full of shit and vinegar today. - GliderGuider 11:53:18 01/18/07 (13)
• I see you cooling down now... you should have done it before writing your dreck - Victor Khomenko 12:07:01 01/18/07 (12)
• Cooling down? Nah, I'm just getting warmed up, globally speaking - GliderGuider 12:38:56 01/18/07 (11)
• Man, you are quick with your data - you just make it on the fly, as you go - Victor Khomenko 12:45:07 01/18/07 (10)
• Your objections would hold more water if I were using this map as evidence of GW. - GliderGuider 12:56:12 01/18/07 (9)
• The funny thing is - it very well might be the evidence of GW... BUT... not the proof of YOUR MODEL - Victor Khomenko 13:04:04 01/18/07 (8)
• How do you determine if they overemphasize the human effect? - GliderGuider 13:35:10 01/18/07 (7)
• He-he... I believe I do - Victor Khomenko 14:06:13 01/18/07 (6)
• Could you point me to one of those "noise level" estimates? - GliderGuider 14:21:56 01/18/07 (5)
• Look through the archives - they have been posted here many times before - Victor Khomenko 14:40:46 01/18/07 (4)
• You're right, I was just fucking around. - GliderGuider 16:41:01 01/18/07 (3)
• Same here... - Victor Khomenko 16:54:00 01/18/07 (2)
• You'll have to wait, I'm afraid - GliderGuider 16:58:55 01/18/07 (1)
• OK, I'll consider voting for a dem, then... - Victor Khomenko 17:07:26 01/18/07 (0)
• Glider, your logic, facts, & debating skills are impeccable, but are falling on deaf ears & thick skulls. Better to - gme109 10:32:27 01/18/07 (1)
• Sigh. I know, but my didactic urges just overwhelm me sometimes. * - GliderGuider 10:41:04 01/18/07 (0)
• Looking forward to the January map. (nt) - rditmars 09:01:03 01/18/07 (1)
• Amen Bruddah - Road Warrior 18:44:56 01/18/07 (0)

Follow Ups

• All this was, was data. - GliderGuider 01/18/0710:02:39 01/18/07 (18)
• You want to compare a 30 year mean for the month of December? - HiFi Guy 10:16:52 01/18/07 (16)
• Why? They're not saying this map proves global warming, and neither am I. - GliderGuider 10:27:48 01/18/07 (15)
• You sure did, and now you are trying to have it both ways - Victor Khomenko 11:35:43 01/18/07 (14)
• "The observation fits the model" is not "evidence". - GliderGuider 12:25:34 01/18/07 (12)
• The observation most definitely DOES NOT fit the model, sorry to inform you - Victor Khomenko 12:31:34 01/18/07 (11)
• The specific temperature is not the determinant. - GliderGuider 12:48:10 01/18/07 (10)
• LOL! You are a slippery bastard! - Victor Khomenko 13:02:09 01/18/07 (9)
• Re: LOL! You are a slippery bastard! - GliderGuider 13:29:58 01/18/07 (8)
• "at least as far as virtually all climate scientists are concerned." Incorrect again - Victor Khomenko 14:02:05 01/18/07 (7)
• Would 98.5% count as "virtually all"? - GliderGuider 14:18:31 01/18/07 (6)
• At some point there was one Galileo - Victor Khomenko 14:39:14 01/18/07 (5)
• The Oreskes study - GliderGuider 14:46:46 01/18/07 (4)
• I already told you the consensus doesn't matter... why continue beating dead scientist? - Victor Khomenko 14:49:53 01/18/07 (3)
• You suggested Oreskes' study had been discredited - GliderGuider 15:00:33 01/18/07 (2)
• Forgot to add - consensus is nothing but an opinion... science is supposed to be about facts - Victor Khomenko 15:52:00 01/18/07 (0)
• Lemme now say it in Russian - the consensus doesn't matter - Victor Khomenko 15:49:38 01/18/07 (0)
• At least he got one data point. How may data points you got to prove "life begins at conception?" (nt) - PriyaW 12:02:36 01/18/07 (0)
• Not really... you claimed down below that it fit some sort of a GW model... that is kaka. - Victor Khomenko 10:05:36 01/18/07 (0)