In Reply to: Yeast cells == 'unbridled capitalism' posted by jedinvest on January 10, 2007 at 08:02:03:
At least in some sectors of the economy (like the military-industrial complex) it did, though this was at the expense of the needs of the citizens. As well, all the trees in England were cut down in under a feudal system.Capitalism, free markets, mixed and directed economies are just different mechanisms for determining which sectors of the economy get to grow and which don't. The underlying growth imperative doesn't care how it gets expressed. Explicit control over growth can only be exercised in a directed or command economy. A free market economy relies on the indirect control of price allocation, and the price signals may not always be timely or accurate (as we're seeing right now with oil), and don't encompass externalities.
IMO we will see the rapid rise of command economies around the world in the next 30 years, driven in most part by the need to ration oil.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Did unconstrained growth not happen under communism? - GliderGuider 01/10/0711:35:04 01/10/07 (0)