In Reply to: I saw your link. What it didn't include was what you're trying to avoid discussing altogether. posted by morgan fairchild on December 13, 2010 at 09:20:23:
/
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Can you show me where in this thread that I've wanted one Fed rate for UI? - Jack Seaton 12/13/1009:51:37 12/13/10 (13)
- I asked you a question; either answer it or duck it. - morgan fairchild 10:01:47 12/13/10 (12)
- So you can't find where I posted that I wanted one flat rate. Probably because it isn't there. - Jack Seaton 10:05:02 12/13/10 (11)
- So, you can't answer a simple question, let alone three. - morgan fairchild 10:14:04 12/13/10 (10)
- Couldn't find where I supported one flat rate, huh? LOL - Jack Seaton 10:17:54 12/13/10 (9)
- Can you tell us what a "question" is? - morgan fairchild 10:25:07 12/13/10 (8)
- Still looking for your link. - Jack Seaton 12:23:47 12/13/10 (7)
- Your projection may even be more stunning than your lack of focus. - morgan fairchild 13:00:45 12/13/10 (6)
- Why the moniker change? - Jack Seaton 13:20:49 12/13/10 (5)
- Who is from Iowa? - LWR 13:45:59 12/13/10 (4)
- I remember an angry young man from Iowa who used to post here. - Jack Seaton 16:22:19 12/13/10 (2)
- Jack, you've made a spectacle of yourself again....n/m - j_thunders 17:44:59 12/13/10 (0)
- Ooops! Now you're just running your mouth. - morgan fairchild 16:39:39 12/13/10 (0)
- Just for future reference - morgan fairchild 13:55:40 12/13/10 (0)