To tweak or not to tweak, that is the question. Whether ''tis nobler to seek an endless dream via modifications or withdraw into the comfort of attainable satisfaction within the constructs of one's listening environment, endless musical sources and a wide range of musical gear.Having lived with the 3.7i system for nearly four years, I can say with confidence that musical satisfaction is achievable without a lot of DIY tinkering, bi-amping and endless tweaking. As far as tweaks are concerned, simply changing sources upstream will likely have the greatest impact on music reproduction. Amps, preamps, players & turntables/cartridges, cables & interconnects, power supplies, tubes and/or SS gear, sobwoofer(s) etc., will likely have more impact on musicality than fiddling with the speakers beyond the initial room set-up.
One change that I've made recently brought all of this into perspective. My Magtech amp seemed to be overheating outside of the parameters described in the sales literature. Also, sound-wise, my amp didn't seem quite as open as it had been. Was this an amp problem, something upstream or just my imagination (audiophilia nervosa)? After doing a little sleuthing on-line, I learned that the 4000 series Motorola thermal track transistors could fail over time, the problem inherent in Magtech amps sold prior to 2016. Roger agreed to check out the amp, replace the transistors and make sure it was up to spec., all under the Sanders Sound lifetime warranty.
In the meantime, concern over being without music for a prolonged period while my amp was in the shop influenced a bold decision prompted by curiosity. It provided me with a rationale ...or excuse, if you prefer... for purchasing a pair of high powered, light weight mono-block amps that I'd read about that purportedly work well with Maggies difficult load (2 Ohms stable) and would serve as back-up amps should the Magtech ever require more service. The Class D topology of the Wyred4Sound SX-1000R is quite different from the beefy ...and heavy... Class A/B topology of the Sanders Magtech even though both produce the substantial wattage required to quench Maggies thirst for power.
As they break-in, I've found the Wyred4Sound amps are providing just as enjoyable a listening experience as the Magtech amp was when new. The sound signature is indeed different, but not in any negative way that I can describe. Each design topology has it's strengths with few, if any, weaknesses. Oddly enough, the Magtech seems much more forgiving of poor recordings, perhaps a tad warmer (sound-wise as opposed to when it was running too hot) with a wider and deeper soundstage. The Wyred4Sound SX-1000R amps seem more open & extended, slightly forward presentation and slightly more transparent. They also run cool to the touch at high volume. In either case, you get your money's worth and then some (IMHO).
So, there you have it, a recommendation for two excellent amps that work quite well with Maggies.
Cheers,
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Living with Maggies: my 3.7i experience to date, with amp reviews. - Audiophilander 17:36:42 04/25/18 (33)
- RE: Living with Maggies: my 3.7i experience to date, with amp reviews. - DrChaos 09:52:06 04/26/18 (0)
- RE: Living with Maggies: my 3.7i experience to date, with amp reviews. - BDP24 01:26:00 04/26/18 (31)
- Good point. - Audiophilander 03:32:59 04/26/18 (30)
- RE: Good point. - BDP24 07:01:19 04/26/18 (29)
- RE: Good point. - Davey 07:08:19 04/26/18 (28)
- So what would be internally bi-passed ? - emailtim 00:31:06 04/29/18 (27)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - Davey 08:50:20 04/29/18 (26)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - emailtim 10:51:42 04/29/18 (25)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - Davey 15:01:32 04/29/18 (24)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - emailtim 18:06:48 04/29/18 (23)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - Davey 18:20:50 04/29/18 (22)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - emailtim 21:27:07 04/29/18 (21)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - Davey 21:44:11 04/29/18 (20)
- Hey you guys, ... - Audiophilander 22:42:26 04/29/18 (6)
- A few "Bad Apples" love to argue and have to have the last word. - Clarity 15:29:14 05/1/18 (2)
- RE: A few "Bad Apples" love to argue and have to have the last word. - Davey 17:48:46 05/1/18 (0)
- RE: A few "Bad Apples" love to argue and have to have the last word. - emailtim 16:43:02 05/1/18 (0)
- RE: Hey you guys, ... - emailtim 01:00:14 04/30/18 (2)
- RE: Hey you guys, ... - Audiophilander 04:00:40 04/30/18 (1)
- RE: Hey you guys, ... - emailtim 13:51:59 04/30/18 (0)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - emailtim 21:59:24 04/29/18 (12)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - Davey 22:14:33 04/29/18 (11)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - emailtim 01:09:12 04/30/18 (10)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - Davey 06:36:10 04/30/18 (9)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - emailtim 13:45:32 04/30/18 (8)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - BDP24 19:15:46 04/30/18 (6)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - emailtim 21:03:00 04/30/18 (1)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - Davey 07:36:42 05/1/18 (0)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - Davey 19:51:08 04/30/18 (3)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - BDP24 21:52:18 04/30/18 (2)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - Davey 07:29:50 05/1/18 (1)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - BDP24 11:29:40 05/1/18 (0)
- RE: So what would be internally bi-passed ? - Davey 17:40:03 04/30/18 (0)