Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Possibly bi-amping my MG2.5R's - RickeyM 08:50:23 08/2/13 (16)

• RE: Possibly bi-amping my MG2.5R's - JBen 16:55:37 08/2/13 (0)
• RE: Possibly bi-amping my MG2.5R's - pictureguy 15:16:35 08/2/13 (0)
• & not clipping @ 1½ohms is an outstanding accomplishment - Mart 13:44:26 08/2/13 (10)
• I would not remove the 2 ohm resistor when going active (nt) - neolith 14:14:26 08/2/13 (2)
• It's part of a network that Magnepan put in there for a reason nt - RickeyM 14:17:44 08/2/13 (1)
• primarily, as a less amplifier-surly load - Mart 14:51:41 08/2/13 (0)
• Uh, that would be 3 1/2-ohms. - RickeyM 08/2/1314:10:08 08/2/13 (6)
• sorry, thought you'ld be going active biamplification _ ‹nt› - Mart 15:08:18 08/2/13 (5)
• Yes, active bi-amplification. - RickeyM 18:31:28 08/2/13 (4)
• RE: Yes, active bi-amplification. - AkuAnkka 10:33:54 08/3/13 (1)
• Correct nt - RickeyM 05:33:58 08/4/13 (0)
• Just to be clear … - Mart 19:01:02 08/2/13 (1)
• Yes - RickeyM 04:50:35 08/3/13 (0)
• RE: Possibly bi-amping my MG2.5R's - neolith 09:33:25 08/2/13 (2)
• RE: Possibly bi-amping my MG2.5R's - RickeyM 14:04:39 08/2/13 (1)
• 100 wpc in 8, 200 wpc in 4- should be fine (nt) - neolith 14:21:59 08/2/13 (0)

Follow Ups

• Uh, that would be 3 1/2-ohms. - RickeyM 08/2/1314:10:08 08/2/13 (6)
• sorry, thought you'ld be going active biamplification _ ‹nt› - Mart 15:08:18 08/2/13 (5)
• Yes, active bi-amplification. - RickeyM 18:31:28 08/2/13 (4)
• RE: Yes, active bi-amplification. - AkuAnkka 10:33:54 08/3/13 (1)
• Correct nt - RickeyM 05:33:58 08/4/13 (0)
• Just to be clear … - Mart 19:01:02 08/2/13 (1)
• Yes - RickeyM 04:50:35 08/3/13 (0)