|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
|
|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
It's either going to be a serious quality upgraded passive crossover or bi-amping for my MG2.5's. If I go bi-amped with say 300-400-wpcfor the bass panels, how much power should I feed the ribbons? I want enough power that clipping shouldn't be a concern but I don't want to blow the ribbons with too much.
Oh yeah, nobody plays the system but me.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Possibly bi-amping my MG2.5R's - RickeyM 08:50:23 08/2/13 (16)
- RE: Possibly bi-amping my MG2.5R's - JBen 16:55:37 08/2/13 (0)
- RE: Possibly bi-amping my MG2.5R's - pictureguy 15:16:35 08/2/13 (0)
- & not clipping @ 1½ohms is an outstanding accomplishment - Mart 13:44:26 08/2/13 (10)
- I would not remove the 2 ohm resistor when going active (nt) - neolith 14:14:26 08/2/13 (2)
- It's part of a network that Magnepan put in there for a reason nt - RickeyM 14:17:44 08/2/13 (1)
- primarily, as a less amplifier-surly load - Mart 14:51:41 08/2/13 (0)
- Uh, that would be 3 1/2-ohms. - RickeyM 14:10:08 08/2/13 (6)
- sorry, thought you'ld be going active biamplification _ ‹nt› - Mart 15:08:18 08/2/13 (5)
- Yes, active bi-amplification. - RickeyM 18:31:28 08/2/13 (4)
- RE: Yes, active bi-amplification. - AkuAnkka 10:33:54 08/3/13 (1)
- Correct nt - RickeyM 05:33:58 08/4/13 (0)
- Just to be clear … - Mart 19:01:02 08/2/13 (1)
- Yes - RickeyM 04:50:35 08/3/13 (0)
- RE: Possibly bi-amping my MG2.5R's - neolith 09:33:25 08/2/13 (2)
- RE: Possibly bi-amping my MG2.5R's - RickeyM 14:04:39 08/2/13 (1)
- 100 wpc in 8, 200 wpc in 4- should be fine (nt) - neolith 14:21:59 08/2/13 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
