|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
|
|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: Second attempt posted by josh358 on June 25, 2011 at 16:54:31:
Actually, suspension compliance shouldn't change, ideally. That property principally rests between wires/foils, in the gaps. What stiffens is akin to cone stiffness, not spider stiffness. That is the voice-coil is less likely to vibrate like a plucked string. What I was saying was those bass frequencies are far less likely to be 'helped' by said additional harmonics.
(in case some lurker is lost) Adding foil to the unused side is akin to an I-beam structure where the foils are the flanges & the mylar is the webbing, which is why I didn't suggest doubling-up on foil on the one side. The I-beam was developed to make the most efficient use of steel. The result is a greater rigidity to weight ratio. The opposite of traditional round-wire. Besides, the foil has to be wired to the XO anyway, those internal terminals are external to the mylar anyway. They don't care which side they're on. In fact, on old Maggies, it was on the other side.
... just my 2¢♪ moderate Mart ♫ ☺ Planar Asylum
where speakers are thin & music isn't
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Second attempt - Mart 06/25/1117:53:00 06/25/11 (1)
- RE: Second attempt - josh358 18:14:41 06/25/11 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2026, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
