In Reply to: RE: Here you go posted by JBen on July 11, 2017 at 10:11:26:
I am sorry that my reply was a little condensed. The explanation was put together over a few years of research into audiology papers and a few audio papers and lots of conjecture that was later confirmed by bat cat and rat audiology studies. I assembled the explanation over a couple of years of argument on other forums and emails and took some 500 discussion posts. I created a fuller more coherent explanation that fills out 3 pages but am waiting for more documentation to close it. So I tried to condense it into as short an explanation as I could.
If you want me to expand on any point then I can do so.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Here you go - Satie 07/12/1708:43:30 07/12/17 (4)
- RE: Here you go - JBen 09:52:57 07/12/17 (3)
- RE: Here you go - Satie 10:28:23 07/12/17 (2)
- RE: Here you go - Satie 10:44:24 07/12/17 (1)
- RE: Here you go - JBen 10:51:44 07/12/17 (0)