In Reply to: RE: Series vs Parallel XO & Maggie Physics. posted by emsquare on July 17, 2010 at 09:22:43:
A bit of group delay doesn't seem to do any harm. The ear is basically a spectrum analyzer -- lots of little resonators, with detectors in them. So the brain isn't seeing the waveform in the time domain, in essence it's sampling an RTA display and saying "OK, these are the frequencies that are present in this slice of time." As long as the hair cells are triggered at approximately the same time, the brain will conclude that the frequencies are arriving simultaneously. You have to accept some slop in the time and frequency analysis because of the uncertainty principle, if you measure exactly when a sound arrives you don't know what the frequency is, and vice versa.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Series vs Parallel XO & Maggie Physics. - josh358 07/17/1011:04:18 07/17/10 (6)
- RE: Series vs Parallel XO & Maggie Physics. - emsquare 13:38:24 07/17/10 (5)
- RE: Series vs Parallel XO & Maggie Physics. - josh358 14:08:54 07/17/10 (4)
- RE: Series vs Parallel XO & Maggie Physics. - emsquare 14:29:58 07/22/10 (3)
- RE: Series vs Parallel XO & Maggie Physics. - josh358 15:46:30 07/22/10 (2)
- RE: Series vs Parallel XO & Maggie Physics. - emsquare 16:06:28 07/23/10 (1)
- RE: Series vs Parallel XO & Maggie Physics. - josh358 16:23:14 07/23/10 (0)