In Reply to: Crossover for bi-amping posted by Andre Linoge on March 20, 2001 at 14:03:38:
Do you have the component values of the crossover and can you draw a schematic of it from what you see?IMHO duplicating the responses of the original passive crossover with an active version would be the best approach to start with.
Regards.
Davey.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Crossover for bi-amping - Davey 03/20/0115:13:00 03/20/01 (14)
- Re: Crossover for bi-amping - Andre Linoge 16:04:28 03/20/01 (13)
- an active (or passive)crossover is: - Arbelos 10:06:44 03/22/01 (12)
- Re: an active (or passive)crossover is: - Andre Linoge 10:48:38 03/22/01 (11)
- Re: an active (or passive)crossover is: - Arbelos 11:21:31 03/22/01 (10)
- Re: an active (or passive)crossover is: - Andre Linoge 11:56:23 03/22/01 (9)
- Re: an active (or passive)crossover is: - Davey 12:28:13 03/22/01 (8)
- Re: an active (or passive)crossover is: - Andre Linoge 15:08:30 03/22/01 (7)
- Re: an active (or passive)crossover is: - Arbelos 19:27:20 03/22/01 (6)
- Re: an active (or passive)crossover is: - Andre Linoge 22:28:20 03/22/01 (5)
- Re:-> audio-x-stream.com - Arbelos 11:53:12 03/23/01 (1)
- Re:-> audio-x-stream.com - Doug 15:26:59 03/23/01 (0)