In Reply to: Some clarification needed... posted by s.hum on September 22, 2001 at 06:05:27:
it was ...
4( 8ohm resistors )
4( 0.47mfd caps )
4( 10pfd caps )This makes for 4 Zobels. 2 per channel. As such I recommended splitting the single Zobel usually used for a single cable per channel. So, instead of using a 4ohm resistor coupled to a 1mfd cap to conjugate ultrasonic instabilities above the Nyquist frequency, I opted to split it since the units are in parallel. You can also try a single 4ohm Zobel per channel at the amp but that's a side issue.
The bypass cap is either to bypass (be wired in parallel with) the Theta or the Zobel. ie:
0----- 8ohm -----+----- 0.47mfd -----+-----0
| |
+----- 0.01mfd -----+
0-----+----- 8ohm ----- 0.47mfd -----+-----0
| |
+---------- 0.01 mfd ----------+
(the idea of bypassing the entire Zobel is because non-inductive resistors at audio frequencies (where it is negligible) become inductive (no longer neglible) at radio frequencies. A disc cap is meant to operate there and would only short out frequencies above 2.3MHz.)
» moderate Mart £ «
Planar Asylum
where the speakers are thin but the music is anything but
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Some clarification needed... - Mart 09/22/0106:52:40 09/22/01 (5)
- Great! - s.hum 07:35:48 09/22/01 (4)
- should re-emphisize - Mart 07:50:27 09/22/01 (3)
- Network location - s.hum 08:21:12 09/22/01 (2)
- across the speaker terminals - Mart 08:36:10 09/22/01 (1)
- Driver inductance. - Arbelos 15:19:46 09/23/01 (0)