|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
|
|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Zobel values for MG1.6? posted by Mart on September 21, 2001 at 20:54:01:
Hi Mart,Does it matter whether the Zobel is inserted before or after the XO? (True Audio's description of a Zobel shows the network insterted after the XO). I had the impression most put the Zobel just across the speaker terminals of the speaker.
Hopefully the last question - the use of the ceramic disk bypass cap: is this to test (work because) one's amp for a possible internal Zobel in its output?
Thanks.
S
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Zobel values for MG1.6? - s.hum 09/22/0106:14:36 09/22/01 (13)
- Re: Zobel values for MG1.6? - Mart 07:06:46 09/22/01 (12)
- Re: Zobel values for MG1.6? - Monk 13:16:21 10/5/01 (11)
- as initially designed yes - Mart 13:39:55 10/5/01 (10)
- Re: as initially designed yes - Monk 13:52:31 10/6/01 (9)
- to make a long story short ... - Mart 08:59:49 10/7/01 (8)
- Re: to make a long story short ... - monk1 12:23:23 10/8/01 (7)
- attenuation in RF region - Mart 22:37:19 10/8/01 (6)
- Re: attenuation in RF region - Monk1 11:01:51 10/9/01 (5)
- 1mm penetration is a 1D model - Mart 11:34:36 10/9/01 (4)
- Re: Skin depth - Monk1 14:04:04 10/9/01 (3)
- Re: Skin depth - Mart 14:55:10 10/9/01 (2)
- Re: Transmission lines - Monk1 15:42:42 10/9/01 (1)
- just substituted a long cable length - Mart 00:42:58 10/23/01 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]