Home Inmate Central

Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome.

The "court" didn't say that at all.

No legal precedent was set by this trial. A jury listened to both legal teams, viewed the evidence presented, listened to testimony (BTW, one of the prosecution's witnesses was the most damning to the prosecution's own case) and deliberated for several days.
Found the defendant not guilty.
There's nothing in the verdict that gives people a constitutional right to open fire at will on people they don't like.
At any rate, people already open fire at the drop of a hat, for stupid stuff too. Like, is Alabama's football team better than Texas A&M's? They didn't need permission from a jury in Wisconsin.




The blissful counterstroke-a considerable new message.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Signature Sound   [ Signature Sound Lounge ]


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • The "court" didn't say that at all. - ghost of olddude55 11/19/2112:30:30 11/19/21 (0)

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.