Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
|
In Reply to: RE: "It's important to note that so far there is no direct evidence for either theory. " posted by Ivan303 on June 1, 2021 at 14:58:39:
I tend to agree that the virus is of natural origin--there's lots of nasty stuff out there in nature that we haven't encountered yet. However, I also firmly believe that it was under study at the Institute of Virology and they had an "accident" that released it into the public.
It is just far too "coincidental" that the initially reported outbreak occurred in the immediate vicinity of China's ONLY Level 4 biohazard lab, that has acknowledged and is known for working with various coronaviruses.
I also firmly believe that the initial "accident" and subsequent outbreak occurred in October 2019, but was not acknowledged until the end of December--after it had gotten out of control, and could no longer be ignored/hidden. By the time the world was notified, the virus had a 3-month head-start, which I consider to be a significant factor in it becoming a global pandemic.
Not hatin', just sayin'...
"And today is for sale and it's all you can afford. Buy your own admission. The whole things got you bored. Well the Lord chooses the good ones, and the bad ones use the Lord"--a very dear friend for decades Michael Stanley (Gee)--RIP
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "It's important to note that so far there is no direct evidence for either theory. " - dark_dave56 06/2/2108:31:17 06/2/21 (1)
- RE: "It's important to note that so far there is no direct evidence for either theory. " - Krav Maga 20:21:08 06/3/21 (0)