Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - A suggested rule change for IC - tweaker456 21:34:49 05/21/21 (21)

• RE: A suggested rule change for IC - ornery 05/22/2116:59:22 05/22/21 (0)
• Do you mean stuff like this? - Jay Buridan 15:52:39 05/22/21 (1)
• RE: Do you mean stuff like this? - ornery 16:47:03 05/22/21 (0)
• Ad hominem responses reflect on the intellect or character of the attacker - Jay Buridan 12:07:56 05/22/21 (1)
• RE: Ad hominem responses reflect on the intellect or character of the attacker - rivervalley817 16:04:31 05/22/21 (0)
• I've got better idea - Dave_K 07:12:28 05/22/21 (4)
• An 'ignore' feature is desperately needed! But very difficult to implement... - vacuous 09:23:45 05/22/21 (2)
• RE: An 'ignore' feature is desperately needed! But very difficult to implement... - Dave_K 06:36:34 05/23/21 (1)
• RE: Avoid at your own risk - tweaker456 07:15:38 05/23/21 (0)
• RE: I've got better idea - dee eye why 07:36:53 05/22/21 (0)
• Maybe they should add medicine to the list of inappropriate topics we cannot comment on. nt - Quadzilla 05:14:07 05/22/21 (0)
• Ad hominem? Okay, but let's simultaneously consider a ban on - tinear 05:13:00 05/22/21 (0)
• Freedom of speech? - grantv 23:23:21 05/21/21 (0)
• RE: A suggested rule change for IC - rivervalley817 22:38:35 05/21/21 (7)
• RE: A suggested rule change for IC - tweaker456 23:53:48 05/21/21 (6)
• RE: A suggested rule change for IC - rivervalley817 09:18:35 05/22/21 (0)
• RE: A suggested rule change for IC - tinear 05:14:49 05/22/21 (3)
• RE: A suggested rule change for IC - srdavis2000 08:46:57 05/22/21 (2)
• RE: A suggested rule change for IC - tweaker456 09:11:23 05/22/21 (1)
• You aren't helping your case with comments like that. - Quadzilla 09:44:52 05/22/21 (0)
• "Am I supposed to sit by and do nothing like almost everyone else?" - Quadzilla 05:10:09 05/22/21 (0)

Follow Ups

• RE: A suggested rule change for IC - ornery 05/22/2116:59:22 05/22/21 (0)